Medical Procedure Charge Reclassification Using Acuity Resource Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare facilities face challenges in accurately classifying and charging for medical procedures due to inconsistent or irrelevant factors, leading to underpayment by insurance carriers and missed revenue opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method for restructuring and reclassifying medical procedure charges based on a plurality of factors, including acuity resource values, using data models and algorithms to assign procedures to appropriate levels, adjusting pricing to meet financial targets, and ensuring accurate reimbursement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional charging practices are used, then simplicity of operation is maintained, but measurement precision of procedure charges deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge accuracyVSAvoidcharge structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charge structure is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels (procedure charge levels 1-7) based on acuity resource values. Each level represents a distinct range of resource consumption, allowing procedures to be classified and charged according to their specific resource requirements rather than using a single uniform charging method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of charge classification from simple procedure types to a multi-dimensional parameter system incorporating acuity resource values, relative weights, and procedure complexity. This transformation enables more precise measurement of procedure charges by considering multiple factors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If inconsistent charging factors are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of reimbursement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereimbursement reliabilityVSAvoidcharge classification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by comparing actual procedure charges against expected reimbursement rates and financial targets. The charge structure is adjusted based on this feedback to ensure charges align with both resource consumption and reimbursement expectations, improving reliability while maintaining systematic consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The charge classification system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it classifies procedures by resource consumption, determines appropriate charge levels, predicts reimbursement rates, and identifies revenue optimization opportunities. This multi-functionality improves reliability by ensuring consistent application across all charging decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If simple charging methods are used, then productivity of charge processing is maintained, but measurement precision of procedure values deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure value accuracyVSAvoidcharge processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of procedures into acuity resource value categories before final charge determination. By pre-establishing procedure charge levels and associated pricing ranges, the system enables rapid and accurate charge processing without requiring complex real-time calculations for each procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The charge structure is designed to be dynamic, allowing adjustment of procedure charge levels and pricing ranges based on changing financial targets, reimbursement rates, and resource value assessments. This dynamic capability maintains measurement precision while adapting to different productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12505473B1Medical procedure charge analysis and restructuring tools and techniques
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 MEDCOM SOLUTIONS
  • US12505473B1 patent drawing
  • US12505473B1 patent drawing
  • US12505473B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented tools, techniques, and algorithms are provided for meeting financial targets in connection with medical procedures (e.g., surgical operations) performed by a healthcare entity. A method for restructuring classification of multiple medical procedures for a healthcare entity may be provided in which medical procedure data including charge related data are collected in association with multiple patient encounters for a medical procedure. A data model is created from the collected data and a predetermined number of procedure charge levels are generated each in association with an acuity resource value range. Each medical procedure is then reclassified into one of the procedure charge levels in accordance with at least one level assignment rule. This reclassification can then be processed to determine whether it results in a predetermined desired data distribution and/or meets financial targets for the medical procedure charge data.