Semiconductor Process Correction Using Sparse-to-Dense Parameter Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor manufacturing processes face challenges in accurately modeling parameter data due to sparse data sets, leading to sub-optimal corrections and inefficiencies in controlling lithographic processes, particularly in low-k1 lithography, where sparse-to-dense behavior and high-order alignment control impact throughput and precision.

Innovation Solution

A method involving sparse and dense data modeling is employed to determine corrections, adapting models based on sparse-to-dense mismatches using historical data and weighting factors to improve model accuracy and reduce noise, allowing for efficient control of lithographic processes without the need for frequent dense measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If dense measurements are performed frequently to improve model accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to reduced throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing dense measurements only occasionally (e.g., once in several lots) rather than frequently, while using sparse measurements for routine monitoring. This reduces the burden of dense measurements while maintaining model accuracy through adaptive updating when dense data becomes available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sparse measurements to maintain operational control and only invokes dense measurements when model accuracy degradation is detected or at scheduled intervals. The model adapts itself by learning from sparse data patterns and automatically requests dense measurements only when necessary, reducing overall measurement burden while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If sparse measurements are used to maintain throughput, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to insufficient data density

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoiddata density
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an adaptive model as an intermediary that bridges sparse measurements and the need for dense data. The model learns patterns from sparse measurements and occasionally incorporates dense measurements to refine its accuracy, effectively mediating between the limited measurement data and the requirement for precise process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the measurement density parameter based on process conditions and model confidence. When the model is confident and process conditions are stable, sparse measurements suffice. When uncertainty increases or anomalies are detected, the system temporarily increases measurement density to improve precision without permanently reducing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If dense measurements are performed to reduce sparse-to-dense mismatch, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to measurement frequency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesparse-to-dense mismatch reductionVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary dense measurements during initial model training or when significant process changes are detected, preparing the model in advance to handle sparse measurements accurately. This preliminary action reduces the need for frequent dense measurements later, minimizing time loss while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Dense measurements are performed periodically rather than continuously, at intervals determined by model confidence levels and process stability. This periodic dense measurement schedule reduces the overall time spent on measurements while maintaining model accuracy by updating the model at strategic intervals when dense data can significantly reduce sparse-to-dense mismatch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260111016A1Determining a correction to a process
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20260111016A1 patent drawing
  • US20260111016A1 patent drawing
  • US20260111016A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for configuring a semiconductor manufacturing process, the method including: obtaining a first value of a first parameter based on measurements associated with a first operation of a process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process and a first sampling scheme; using a recurrent neural network to determine a predicted value of the first parameter based on the first value; and using the predicted value of the first parameter in configuring a subsequent operation of the process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process.