Process Data Detection System with Context-Sensitive Expert Knowledge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack a comprehensive approach for continuous validation processes, including preparation, implementation, and evaluation of experiments, and fail to provide context-sensitive information access across process steps, leading to inefficiencies in knowledge management and decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A device and method for acquiring, checking, and storing status data from multiple process steps using graphical models to represent expert knowledge, allowing for context-sensitive information filtering and networking of data circuits for continuous validation and optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If information is stored in a database with structured data, then information can be called up globally using search terms, but the correct search terms must already be known to obtain helpful results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of expert knowledgeVSAvoidease of information retrieval
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that automatically extracts keywords and generates search terms from process data and contextual information. This intermediary layer bridges the gap between stored expert knowledge and user queries, eliminating the need for users to know precise search terms while maintaining global accessibility of the database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where search queries and results are analyzed to automatically refine and expand the database of search terms and keywords. This feedback loop continuously improves the system's ability to retrieve relevant information without requiring users to possess expert-level search knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If documents or information are stored on local computers, then memory requirements increase significantly, but centralized access and updating become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidcomplexity of information management
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges distributed local storage with centralized database access by implementing a hybrid architecture. Local computers maintain cached versions of frequently accessed expert knowledge, while the central database ensures unified access and centralized updating. This combination reduces memory requirements at individual locations while maintaining ease of access and simplifying update management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of information

If expert knowledge is stored in a centralized database, then it can be accessed globally, but the information lacks context-sensitivity for different process steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of expert knowledgeVSAvoidcontext-sensitivity of information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by associating different subsets of expert knowledge with specific process steps, products, or applications. The system dynamically retrieves and presents only the context-relevant information based on the current process context, ensuring that globally available knowledge is delivered with appropriate local customization and context-sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the presentation and selection of expert knowledge based on real-time process data, user roles, and contextual parameters. This dynamic behavior allows the same centralized database to provide context-sensitive information tailored to different process steps, products, or user needs without requiring separate storage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If comprehensive process data from multiple process steps is collected and analyzed, then statistically secure decisions can be made, but the complexity of data management and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical security of decisionsVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive data processing system into modular components, each handling specific process steps or data types. This segmentation allows the system to collect and analyze data from multiple process steps while managing complexity through organized, independent modules that can be developed, maintained, and scaled separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3056994B1Device and method for detecting, checking and storing process data from at least two process steps
Publication Date: 2018.06.13 KARLSRUHER INST FUR TECH
  • EP3056994B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3056994B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Device for acquiring, verifying and storing process data from at least two process steps (1, 2, 3, 4), comprising at least two data circuits (7, 8, 9, 10), wherein each data circuit is assigned to a process step, with one information processing device (6) per data circuit with an input for process data and for stored expert knowledge, a processing logic for processing the process data with the stored expert knowledge to create new expert knowledge and an output for the new expert knowledge, and a storage unit (5) for storing the new expert knowledge from all data circuits as stored expert knowledge, wherein access to the stored expert knowledge is provided for all data circuits.