Process Impact Matrix Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in understanding and prioritizing the impact of their processes on various goals and challenges, leading to inefficiencies in goal achievement and challenge management.

Innovation Solution

A process impact matrix is generated to assess the impact of each process on overall challenges, using qualitative and quantitative scoring to determine relative impact scores, which are then used to prioritize processes for analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If organizations implement multiple processes to accomplish various goals, then the ability to meet challenges improves, but the complexity of understanding and prioritizing process impacts worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to meet challengesVSAvoidcomplexity of understanding process impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the overall challenges into specific goals and sub-challenges, creating a hierarchical breakdown that makes the complex impact analysis manageable. Each process is evaluated against individual goals rather than the entire challenge set at once, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process impact matrix serves as an intermediary tool that systematically connects processes to goals and challenges. This matrix structure provides a standardized framework for evaluating and comparing process impacts, transforming the complex understanding task into a structured analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If organizations evaluate all processes against all goals, then the completeness of impact understanding improves, but the time and resources required worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of impact understandingVSAvoidtime required for evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual, time-consuming evaluation processes with an automated computational system. The process impact matrix is generated and analyzed using computer-based methods that calculate relative impact scores automatically, significantly reducing the time required while maintaining complete evaluation coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative process impact assessments into quantitative relative impact scores through standardized parameter changes. This conversion enables efficient computational processing and comparison, allowing complete evaluation of all processes against all goals without proportional increases in time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If organizations prioritize processes based on impact analysis, then the efficiency of goal achievement improves, but the complexity of the analysis process worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of goal achievementVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the process impact matrix and relative impact scores provide clear guidance for prioritization decisions. This feedback loop allows organizations to systematically identify high-impact processes and focus resources accordingly, improving efficiency without requiring complex judgment calls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent simplifies the prioritization complexity by transforming multi-dimensional process impact data into a single key parameter: the relative impact score. This parameter consolidation enables straightforward ranking and prioritization of processes based on their overall impact across all goals and challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8645194B1Process impact matrix development and utilization
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US8645194B1 patent drawing
  • US8645194B1 patent drawing
  • US8645194B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of prioritizing processes of an organization includes determining a plurality of processes capable of being performed by the organization, determining a plurality of goals or challenges associated with the organization, and generating a process impact matrix indicating respective impact levels for each process. Each respective impact level is indicative of an impact of each process on each of the plurality of goals or challenges. The method further includes converting each respective impact level to an impact score, determining, for each of the plurality of processes, a relative impact score based on the respective impact levels, and prioritizing each process based on the relative impact scores.