Process Indicator Assessment for In-Operation System Condition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional system diagnostics fail to provide a fast and simple assessment of the current condition of a system in operation, lacking efficient methods for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that acquire data on faults, process time, and media/energy consumption to calculate a process indicator number, which indicates the system's condition, enabling automatic decision-making for maintenance and troubleshooting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional system diagnostics are used, then the system can operate continuously, but the assessment of current system condition is slow and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of system condition assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of diagnostics system
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the overall system condition assessment into three distinct data categories (fault data, process time data, media and energy consumption data), each contributing to specific segments of the process indicator number. This segmentation allows for targeted data collection and simplified analysis of each component separately while maintaining comprehensive system monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process indicator number serves as an intermediary metric that translates complex multi-dimensional system data into a single comprehensible value. This intermediary enables rapid system condition assessment without requiring direct analysis of the underlying complex data structures, thus speeding up diagnostics while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection is implemented, then system condition assessment becomes more accurate, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of system condition assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms diverse physical quantities (fault frequencies, process times, media consumption, energy consumption) into a unified dimensionless process indicator number scaled from 0 to 100. This parameter transformation enables precise system condition assessment through standardized metrics while simplifying the processing of heterogeneous data through consistent normalization and weighting schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring is performed, then system condition detection is improved, but energy and resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of fault detectionVSAvoidenergy consumption for monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system utilizes existing multi-functional sensors and data acquisition infrastructure already present in the process system, rather than adding dedicated monitoring equipment. The process indicator number calculation repurposes routinely collected process data (fault records, process times, media and energy consumption) for diagnostic purposes, thereby improving fault detection reliability without significantly increasing energy consumption or resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230325268A1Method and device for automatically determining a current condition of a system in operation
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 KRONES AG
  • US20230325268A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically determining a current condition of a system in operation includes acquiring first data relating to one or more faults in the system during a process, acquiring second data relating to a process time in the system during the process, acquiring third data relating to media and energy consumption in the system during the process, and determining a process indicator number based on the first, second, and third data. A device for automatically determining a current condition of a system in operation is configured to carry out the method.