Process Intensification for Small-Scale Chemical Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The direct scaling of chemical processes from large to small scales results in excessively large, complex, and costly systems, leading to low process yield and undesired side reactions due to non-uniform temperature, pressure, and residence time exposure of process gas packets, which increases capital and operating costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of process intensification strategies, including 3D printing for additive manufacturing, reactive separations, and non-thermal separation methods like sonoseparation, to create modular, low-capital-intensity systems that achieve uniform processing conditions and reduce energy-intensive separation processes, such as distillation, while leveraging structured materials for enhanced heat transfer and catalyst support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If chemical processes are directly scaled down from large to small scales, then the system size is reduced, but the system becomes excessively complex and costly with non-uniform processing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem sizeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular functional units including a reformer module, synthesis module, and separation module. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently optimized, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining small scale. The segmentation allows for standardized interfaces and simplified integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple process functions are combined into integrated reactor-separator units where reaction and separation occur in the same vessel. This merging eliminates the need for separate downstream separation equipment, reducing system complexity and capital costs while maintaining efficient processing at small scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Volume of moving object

If chemical processes are directly scaled down from large to small scales, then the system size is reduced, but capital and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem sizeVSAvoidcapital intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system operates at elevated pressures and temperatures to enhance reaction rates and equilibria, allowing smaller reactor volumes for the same throughput. This parameter change enables cost-effective small-scale operation by reducing equipment size and capital intensity while maintaining process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

High-thermal-conductivity structured materials are used in reactor construction to improve heat transfer efficiency. This allows for more compact reactor designs with better temperature control, reducing the equipment size needed for small-scale operations and thereby lowering capital costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Volume of moving object

If conventional scaling methods are used, then system size is reduced, but temperature, pressure, and residence time become non-uniform causing low process yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem sizeVSAvoidprocess uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from traditional packed-bed reactors to structured catalyst configurations with controlled porosity and surface area distribution. This dimensional restructuring ensures uniform flow distribution and contact time across the catalyst bed, maintaining process uniformity at small scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Conventional mechanical mixing and heat transfer methods are replaced with structured catalyst designs that provide inherent flow distribution and heat transfer pathways. The structured materials create uniform processing conditions through their geometric properties rather than mechanical intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional separation processes like distillation are used, then product separation is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Separation functions are performed in-situ within the reactor during the reaction process itself, rather than as a separate downstream step. This preliminary action removes products or byproducts as they form, shifting equilibrium and eliminating the need for energy-intensive distillation while maintaining product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes condensation of water and other condensable components at reaction conditions to achieve separation. This phase transition-based separation occurs naturally during the exothermic reaction process, providing product purification without additional energy input for distillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These strategies significantly reduce capital and operating costs by enabling efficient conversion of syngas to liquid products like methanol or ammonia at small scales, achieving higher product purity and reducing the need for energy-intensive processes, thereby making small-scale chemical production more cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

Implementation Method 1

the reformer is configured to receive the flows of the flare gas and air; and the reformer configured to convert the air and flare gas into the syngas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

the reactor unit is configured to convert the syngas into a liquid product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

The structured materials have the effect of increasing thermal homogeneity in a reacting mixture and increasing heat transfer rates from the reacting mixture to the cooling medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20240017235A1Systems, Devices and Methods for Intensification of Reformers and Downstream Chemical Synthesis
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 M2X ENERGY INC
  • US20240017235A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017235A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Intensified plants comprising chemical reformers and downstream chemical synthesis equipment. Systems, methods and devices for process intensification (PI) that result in lowering part count, merging functionality, removing bottlenecks, reducing costs, and modularizing subsystems for ease of assembly and maintenance to obtain the overall simplification needed to achieve competitive product cost at small scales. In an embodiment, the improved plants employ engine reformers to produce synthesis gas, which is further converted into end products using intensified downstream reactors.