Process Mining Ambiguity Resolution via Participant Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Process mining tools often fail to capture all elements of a process, leading to low-fidelity process visualizations that can affect the accuracy of results generated by these tools.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that captures an active process using event log files, identifies ambiguities, and utilizes participant feedback from relevant subject matter experts to transform the process and generate a new workflow, thereby enhancing and accelerating process times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If process mining tools automatically discover processes from event logs, then automation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to missed process elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated process discoveryVSAvoidprocess visualization fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system sends polls to relevant participants to resolve ambiguities in the event log, creating a feedback loop where human expertise corrects automated discoveries. Participants provide feedback on ambiguous process elements, which is then used to refine the process model and improve visualization fidelity while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Relevant participants act as intermediaries between the automated process mining tool and the actual process reality. They resolve ambiguities that the automated tool cannot detect, bridging the gap between automated discovery and accurate process representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If process mining tools use automated discovery from event logs, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to missing process elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess discovery efficiencyVSAvoidprocess model accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where participants review and correct ambiguous process elements discovered by the automated tool. This feedback ensures that the final process model is both efficient (from automated discovery) and reliable (from human verification).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated process discovery to identify ambiguities, then proactively engages participants to resolve these ambiguities before finalizing the process model. This preliminary action maintains productivity while ensuring reliability through advance human review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If process mining tools capture all process elements with high fidelity, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess visualization fidelityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the automated tool overly complex to detect all ambiguities, the system introduces participants as external intermediaries who provide the missing contextual knowledge. This maintains system simplicity while achieving high measurement precision through human expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If process mining tools monitor all process deviations, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to comprehensive monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconformance checking accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from participants to selectively focus monitoring efforts on ambiguous or critical process elements rather than uniformly monitoring all deviations. This reduces the time required for comprehensive monitoring while maintaining high reliability through targeted human expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250200597A1Ambiguity resolution through participant feedback
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250200597A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200597A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a method for transforming an active process utilizing participant feedback and generating a new workflow for an enhanced and accelerated process includes capturing an active process with a plurality of components based on a plurality of event log files and a plurality of relevant participants of the active process. The method also includes identifying, based on the plurality of event log files, ambiguity associated with at least one component of the active process. The method also includes sending a poll to at least a portion of relevant participants from the plurality of relevant participants, where the poll identifies the ambiguity and includes a request to resolve the ambiguity. The method also includes receiving feedback from the portion of relevant participants and generating a new process by transforming the active process based on the feedback from the portion of relevant participants.