Process Variability Simulation for Multi-Step Setpoint Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing processes face inherent variability due to factors like raw material changes, environmental conditions, and machinery variability, leading to unpredictable outcomes and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a deep learning-based process prediction model that simulates manufacturing processes with varying parameters to optimize setpoints, reducing variability and improving efficiency by dynamically adjusting to changes in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manufacturing control methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but process variability increases leading to unpredictable outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess predictabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training deep learning models on historical process data before actual manufacturing operations. The models are pre-trained to predict process outcomes and variability, allowing the system to anticipate and compensate for variations before they occur in real production, thereby improving reliability without adding operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual copies of the manufacturing process through digital twins and simulation models. These digital replicas allow the system to test and optimize process parameters virtually before applying them to physical production, reducing actual process variability while maintaining system simplicity through software-based solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If process parameters are adjusted dynamically to reduce variability, then manufacturing precision improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control precisionVSAvoidparameter monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where deep learning models constantly analyze process data and automatically adjust parameters to maintain optimal performance. The feedback mechanism uses trained models to detect patterns and make real-time corrections, improving manufacturing precision while the automation reduces the burden of manual monitoring and measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical and manual monitoring systems with intelligent software-based detection using deep learning algorithms. The models automatically detect and measure process parameters and variations through data analysis, eliminating the need for complex physical measurement systems and reducing monitoring difficulty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If deep learning models are used to simulate and optimize processes, then productivity increases through faster optimization, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training of deep learning models using historical data during off-production periods or initial setup phases. This preliminary action allows the models to be fully trained before deployment, enabling rapid optimization during actual production without requiring complex real-time computational resources, thus improving productivity while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital twins and virtual process models to replicate manufacturing operations. These digital copies allow extensive simulation and optimization testing without affecting physical production, enabling rapid iteration and improvement of optimization algorithms while isolating computational complexity to the virtual environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12585839B2Process variability simulator for manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 NANOTRONICS IMAGING INC
  • US12585839B2 patent drawing
  • US12585839B2 patent drawing
  • US12585839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system receives one or more process parameters to be optimized during a multi-step manufacturing process. The computing system initiates a process prediction model in accordance with the one or more process parameters. The computing system simulates the multi-step manufacturing process using a plurality of sets of different setpoints until the one or more process parameters are optimized. The computing system identifies a first set of setpoints from the plurality of sets of different setpoints that optimized the one or more process parameters. The computing system causes the station controller to apply the first set of setpoints to the one or more stations.