Processing Chamber Analysis Module for Automated Corrective Action

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic methods for manufacturing equipment are inefficient in analyzing data across multiple stages of processing, leading to suboptimal production consistency and reliability, as they often require manual expert intervention and separate analysis of different data stages.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive analysis module that synthesizes data from various stages of manufacturing, including recipe data, operational data, and historical data, to provide automated recommendations for corrective actions, utilizing rule-based processing, statistical metrics, and machine learning models to improve substrate processing procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional diagnostic methods are used to analyze manufacturing equipment data, then manual expert intervention is required, but this leads to inefficiency and suboptimal production consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction consistencyVSAvoiddiagnostic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-diagnosis of manufacturing equipment by synthesizing data from multiple sources (recipe data, operational data, historical data) and automatically generating diagnostic results and corrective actions without requiring manual expert intervention, thereby improving both efficiency and consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where operational data and historical data are constantly analyzed against recipe specifications, and corrective actions are automatically implemented based on the analysis results, creating a closed-loop control system that improves production consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If separate analysis of different data stages is performed, then data from various processing stages can be examined individually, but this leads to loss of comprehensive insights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive data insightsVSAvoiddata analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple processing stages (recipe data, operational data, historical data) into a unified analysis framework, synthesizing all data types together to generate comprehensive diagnostic insights that capture inter-stage relationships and patterns that would be missed in separate analyses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Extent of automation

If manual expert intervention is used for diagnostic analysis, then complex equipment issues can be addressed, but this increases the need for human resources and reduces automation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic automationVSAvoidmanual intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual expert diagnostic processes with an automated computational system that uses data synthesis and analysis algorithms to perform diagnostic functions, substituting human mechanical analysis with automated information processing while maintaining diagnostic capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240310826A1Comprehensive analysis module for determining processing equipment performance
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20240310826A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310826A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310826A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving, by a processing device, first data indicative of a processing recipe. The method further includes receiving second data. The second data includes operational data associated with the processing recipe. The method further includes receiving third data. The third data includes historical data associated with the processing recipe. The method further includes performing analysis indicative of performance of a processing chamber based on the first, second, and third data. The method further includes causing performance of a corrective action in view of the analysis.