Processing Machine Changeover With Overlapped Rotary Stamping Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processing machines require manual intervention and significant downtime for changing machining orders, leading to inefficiencies and increased operator workload during job changes.

Innovation Solution

A method for automating the reconfiguration and maintenance of processing units in a processing machine, allowing seamless transitions between processing jobs by pre-loading necessary configurations and executing changeover processes automatically, minimizing operator intervention and reducing downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a new processing task is implemented on an existing processing machine, then production flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the risk of contamination from previous tasks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction flexibilityVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A cleaning device is introduced as an intermediary between processing tasks to remove contaminants from the processing machine. The cleaning device executes cleaning tasks that generate cleaning signals, which are sent to the control device to initiate appropriate cleaning routines, thereby preventing contamination while maintaining production flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary cleaning actions before changing processing tasks by monitoring process parameters that indicate contamination risk. When contamination is detected or anticipated, the control device automatically initiates cleaning routines in advance, ensuring the machine is clean before the next task begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If manual cleaning and changeover procedures are used, then contamination risk is reduced, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination controlVSAvoidchangeover efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing machine performs self-cleaning through automated cleaning routines executed by an integrated cleaning device. The control device automatically monitors process parameters, determines when cleaning is needed, and initiates cleaning sequences without manual intervention, thereby maintaining contamination control while eliminating productivity losses associated with manual changeover procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from process parameters (such as temperature, pressure, or sensor readings) to automatically determine when cleaning is required. The control device receives continuous feedback during processing and initiates cleaning routines based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual monitoring and intervention while maintaining contamination control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If comprehensive cleaning routines are executed between tasks, then contamination is prevented, but processing time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial cleaning actions based on the actual contamination risk assessed from process parameters. Instead of executing comprehensive cleaning routines for every task change, the control device determines the appropriate level of cleaning needed based on the specific processing history and contamination indicators, thereby preventing unnecessary time loss while maintaining adequate contamination prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning intensity and duration are dynamically adjusted based on process parameters such as temperature, pressure, and sensor readings. The control device modifies cleaning parameters in real-time according to the actual contamination risk, executing more intensive cleaning only when necessary and lighter cleaning when process conditions indicate low contamination risk, thereby optimizing the balance between contamination prevention and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4572959B1Method for changing a processing task carried out on a processing machine
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 KOENIG & BAUER AG
  • EP4572959B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4572959B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4572959B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for changing a processing task carried out on a processing machine (01). The processing machine (01) has multiple assemblies (100; 300; 600; 700; 900; 1000), and the processing machine (01) has at least one processing assembly (600), which is designed as a task assembly (600) that has a plate cylinder (602), and at least one processing assembly (900), which is designed as a shaping assembly (900), said at least one shaping assembly (900) being designed as a rotation stamping device (900). The method has the following steps: - completing a first processing task using the processing machine (01) while at least one substrate (02) is being processed using the at least two processing assemblies (600; 900) of the processing machine (01); - automatically finishing the first processing task and automatically beginning a changeover; - completing the changeover of the processing machine (01) in order to adapt at least one assembly (100; 300; 600; 700; 900; 1000) of the processing machine (01) to the configuration of a directly subsequent processing task, wherein the configuration of the processing machine (01) for the at least one subsequent processing task is loaded and/or set and/or stored on a machine controller prior to the changeover, and at least one changeover process of the at least one shaping assembly (900) is carried out during the changeover so as to overlap temporally with at least one other changeover process of the processing machine (01); and - starting the directly subsequent processing task while at least one substrate (02) is being processed using the at least two processing assemblies (600; 900).