Processing System Performance Optimization via Second-Order Difference Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Processing systems experience decreased performance with increased load, leading to inefficient system utilization and difficulty in identifying and eliminating bottlenecks, as existing methods rely on unsystematic approaches to determine optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that includes modules for data acquisition, analysis, normalization, performance analysis, comparison, and control to calculate the slope between data points, compute a second-order difference, and set a performance threshold to optimize processing system performance, allowing for better control and adjustment to achieve desired throughput and response time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If throughput is increased to improve productivity, then system output increases, but response time increases and performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors performance data including throughput and response time, calculates the second order difference to detect inflection points, and provides feedback control by adjusting system parameters when optimal performance thresholds are approached or exceeded, creating a closed-loop control system that dynamically balances throughput and response time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by identifying inflection points through mathematical analysis (second order difference calculation) of performance data, then adjusts system configuration or load distribution based on detected optimal thresholds, transforming static parameter settings into adaptive parameter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If system utilization is increased to improve productivity, then throughput increases, but bottlenecks become more difficult to locate and eliminate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem utilizationVSAvoidbottleneck detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual bottleneck detection methods with automated mathematical analysis, using second order difference calculations on performance data to objectively identify inflection points and bottlenecks, substituting human analysis with algorithmic detection that scales with system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces performance data and mathematical analysis as intermediaries between system operation and bottleneck identification, using calculated metrics (slopes, second order differences, inflection points) as mediators that translate complex system behavior into actionable intelligence for bottleneck detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If a maximum acceptable response time is set as a limit for maximum throughput, then response time is controlled, but system utilization operates at a point that may be less than optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time controlVSAvoidsystem utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms static response time limits into dynamic control thresholds by continuously analyzing performance data trends, calculating inflection points that adapt to changing system conditions, and adjusting throughput targets dynamically rather than operating at fixed utilization points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of performance data to identify optimal thresholds and inflection points before making control decisions, calculating slopes and second order differences in advance to predict optimal operating points, enabling proactive rather than reactive control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7668952B2Apparatus, system, and method for controlling a processing system
Publication Date: 2010.02.23 X CORP
  • US7668952B2 patent drawing
  • US7668952B2 patent drawing
  • US7668952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, system, and method are disclosed for controlling a processing system. The apparatus to control a processing system is provided with a plurality of modules configured to functionally execute the necessary steps of controlling a processing system. These modules in the described embodiments include a data acquisition module that acquires performance data for a processing system, a data analysis module that calculates the slope between adjacent data points, a data normalization module that normalizes the data and computes a second order difference between the calculated slopes, a performance analysis module that determines the performance value that corresponds to the maximum calculated slope, a performance comparison module that sets a preferred performance threshold, and a performance control module that controls the processing system to achieve the preferred performance threshold.