Processor Data Routing for Power and Priority Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic devices with multiple processors unnecessarily consume power and provide user-unintended data due to unconditional activation of the second processor for data reception, regardless of data importance or priority, leading to user inconvenience.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus where the first processor identifies the service or application corresponding to received data and determines whether to activate the second processor or route the data to another external device, based on the identified information, thereby optimizing power usage and data handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the second processor is unconditionally activated to process received data, then data processing capability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational state parameter of the second processor from always active to conditionally active based on data priority classification. High-priority data triggers processor activation while low-priority data does not, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining necessary processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of fully activating the second processor for all received data, the system applies partial action by selectively processing only high-priority data through the second processor. This partial processing approach reduces power consumption while still handling critical communications effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If the second processor is unconditionally activated for all received data, then data processing completeness is improved, but user convenience deteriorates due to presentation of low-priority data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing completenessVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality levels of processing to different data based on their priority. High-priority data receives full processing and presentation to the user, while low-priority data is handled differently (not presented immediately), creating a differentiated quality approach that improves user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial processing by selectively presenting only high-priority data to the user while excluding low-priority data. This partial action approach maintains data processing completeness for system operations while improving user convenience by filtering out unnecessary notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10361978B2Method and apparatus for managing data using plural processors
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10361978B2 patent drawing
  • US10361978B2 patent drawing
  • US10361978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing data in an electronic device including a first processor and a second processor, the method comprising: receiving data transmitted by a first external device by using the first processor; identifying, by the first processor, a service or content corresponding to the data; in response to detecting that the data corresponds to a first service or a first content, using the first processor to transmit at least a portion of the data to the second processor; and in response to detecting that the data corresponds to a second service or a second content, using the first processor to transmit at least a portion of the data to a second external device.