Multi-threading Processor Data Hazard Hint Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data hazards in multi-threading processors lead to performance degradation and erroneous results due to data dependency between instructions, causing threads to stall and resulting in significant performance damage, especially during long latency periods like memory access.

Innovation Solution

A multi-threading processor with a cache and controller that determines data hazards and uses hint information to initiate operations in specific threads while maintaining data hazards, allowing pre-pipeline operations to improve performance by calculating the expected time of hazard resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the processor stalls all threads when data hazard occurs, then data correctness is maintained, but processor performance deteriorates due to execution unit idle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctnessVSAvoidprocessor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor segments thread management by identifying and isolating threads affected by data hazards from those that are not affected. The hazard detection unit specifically identifies threads in hazard states, while the thread switching unit can selectively switch between affected and non-affected threads, allowing unaffected threads to continue execution and maintain processor performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processor dynamically adjusts thread execution states based on real-time hazard detection. Threads can transition between active, stalled, and switched states depending on hazard conditions. The thread switching unit dynamically selects which thread to execute next based on current hazard states, enabling adaptive performance optimization while maintaining data correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the processor switches threads when one thread encounters data hazard, then execution continuity is improved, but performance deteriorates if all threads are in hazard state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution continuityVSAvoidperformance damage duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processor performs preliminary hazard detection for multiple threads before switching execution. The hazard detection unit proactively identifies threads in hazard states, and the thread switching unit uses this advance information to select appropriate threads for execution. This preliminary detection allows the processor to avoid switching to threads that will immediately stall, reducing wasted switching overhead and improving execution continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The processor maintains continuity of useful action by keeping threads in a ready state rather than fully stalling them when hazards are detected. The thread switching unit can quickly resume execution of threads once hazards are resolved, minimizing idle time. The system maintains thread context and readiness information, enabling rapid resumption of useful work without complete thread termination and restart overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If the processor waits for hazard resolution before resuming thread operation, then data correctness is ensured, but execution time increases due to stall periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctnessVSAvoidthread stall time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processor implements a feedback mechanism where the hazard detection unit continuously monitors thread states and provides real-time information to the thread switching unit. When hazards are resolved, the feedback loop automatically triggers thread resumption. This continuous feedback ensures data correctness is maintained while minimizing stall time, as threads are resumed immediately upon hazard resolution rather than waiting for fixed time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The processor prepares thread resumption in advance by maintaining thread context and readiness information in ready queues. When hazards are detected, threads are placed in a suspended but prepared state rather than being fully terminated. Upon hazard resolution, the pre-prepared thread information allows immediate resumption of execution without restart overhead, reducing the effective stall time while ensuring data correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12118356B1Multi-threading processor and operating method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 XCENA INC
  • US12118356B1 patent drawing
  • US12118356B1 patent drawing
  • US12118356B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-threading processor is provided, which includes a cache including a memory and a controller, and a core electrically connected to the cache and configured to simultaneously execute and manage a plurality of threads, in which the core is configured to determine an occurrence of a data hazard for the plurality of threads and stall operations of the plurality of threads, receive, from the cache, hint information instructing a first thread of the plurality of threads to operate, and initiate an operation of the first thread based on the hint information while the data hazard for the plurality of threads is maintained.