Processor Load Speculation Recovery via Dependency Vectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Processors face challenges in managing load dependencies due to varying latency in load operations, which can lead to inefficient scheduling and execution of dependent instructions when loads miss in the cache.

Innovation Solution

A processor scheduler utilizes dependency vectors to track dependencies across multiple pipeline stages and cycles, allowing for speculative execution and timely cancellation of instructions when loads miss in the cache, ensuring efficient handling of dependencies through kill signals and wake-up mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the processor assumes the shortest possible latency for load operations to enable efficient scheduling of dependent instructions, then instruction scheduling efficiency is improved, but the processor must implement complex mechanisms to handle cache misses and recover from speculative execution errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidload speculation recovery mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor performs preliminary speculative execution of dependent instructions based on the assumption that the load will hit in cache. The scheduler schedules instructions at the earliest possible latency without waiting for actual cache results, and only recovers from speculation if the load misses. This allows efficient scheduling while maintaining correctness through recovery mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The processor implements feedback mechanisms where the actual load result (hit or miss) is fed back to the scheduler and execution pipelines. When a load misses, the kill signal propagates through the dependency vector to cancel incorrectly executed dependent instructions. This feedback loop ensures correctness while allowing speculative execution to proceed initially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the processor cancels all dependent instructions when a load misses in the cache, then correctness is maintained, but execution time increases due to the need to flush and re-schedule instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution correctnessVSAvoidinstruction cancellation and re-scheduling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dependency tracking is segmented into individual bit positions in the dependency vector, with each bit representing a specific instruction's dependency status. This segmentation allows selective cancellation of only those instructions that are actually dependent on the missed load, rather than flushing the entire pipeline. The segmented approach minimizes unnecessary cancellations and reduces recovery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processor dynamically adjusts the cancellation behavior based on the actual dependency relationships tracked in the dependency vector. Rather than a static all-or-nothing cancellation approach, the system dynamically identifies and cancels only the minimal set of instructions that are truly affected by the load miss, reducing the time loss from cancellation and re-scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the processor tracks detailed dependency information for each instruction to enable precise recovery, then the accuracy of speculation recovery is improved, but the hardware resources required for dependency tracking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency tracking accuracyVSAvoiddependency vector storage and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dependency information is represented as compact bit vectors rather than full dependency graphs. Each instruction maintains a dependency vector where bits indicate dependency on specific load instructions. This parameter transformation from complex relational structures to compact binary representations achieves precise tracking with minimal hardware resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The dependency vector structure serves multiple functions: it tracks direct and indirect dependencies, enables selective cancellation, supports speculative execution, and facilitates recovery. This universal data structure handles all dependency-related operations without requiring separate mechanisms for each function, reducing overall hardware complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10514925B1Load speculation recovery
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 APPLE INC
  • US10514925B1 patent drawing
  • US10514925B1 patent drawing
  • US10514925B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods for managing dependencies between instruction operations when speculatively issuing load instruction operations. A processor may maintain dependency vectors for sources of instruction operations dispatched to the scheduler. The dependency vector may include a column for each cycle of the load recovery window and a row for each load execution pipeline. When a load speculatively issues, any instruction operation which is dependent on the load may have a bit set in the earliest bit position of its dependency vector to indicate the dependency. The bit may shift in the dependency vector toward the cancel bit position during each clock cycle as the load executes. If the load does not produce its data at the expected latency, an instruction operation may be canceled if there is a bit in the cancel bit position of the dependency vector row corresponding to the execution pipeline of the load.