Automatic Maintenance Detection in Processor Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current process device systems, such as fire or intruder alarm systems, face challenges during maintenance as they cannot differentiate between maintenance triggers and actual events, leading to inappropriate reactions and the need for manual monitoring, which is inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A process device system with a test device that can automatically inform the control unit of maintenance activities, allowing the system to recognize and react appropriately, using a separate communication channel independent of the field device and control unit communication, enabling decentralized selection and safe operation during maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the process equipment is put into a separate state to prevent inappropriate reactions during maintenance, then false alarms are prevented, but manual monitoring is required which reduces efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of false alarmsVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The test device automatically identifies itself to the control unit through a unique identifier, enabling the system to self-manage maintenance state transitions without requiring manual monitoring. The control unit autonomously switches to maintenance mode upon receiving the identifier, eliminating the need for human operators to continuously monitor maintenance activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit receives feedback in the form of a unique identifier from the test device, which triggers automatic state transitions. This feedback mechanism enables the system to automatically recognize maintenance mode and adjust its behavior accordingly, preventing false alarms while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If a direct data exchange between control unit and field device is implemented for maintenance selection, then automated maintenance control is achieved, but compatibility with existing DC line technology is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated maintenance controlVSAvoidcompatibility with DC line technology
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The unique identifier serves multiple functions: it identifies the test device, indicates maintenance mode, and works across different communication technologies including DC line technology. This universal approach allows automated maintenance control without requiring specific communication protocols or additional infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of implementing complex direct data exchange protocols, the system uses a simplified representation (unique identifier) that carries all necessary information for maintenance control. This copying approach maintains compatibility with existing DC line technology while achieving automated maintenance functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the control unit monitors maintenance activities manually, then system safety is maintained, but additional personnel and costs are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidpersonnel requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit autonomously manages maintenance state transitions by receiving unique identifiers from test devices. The system self-monitors maintenance activities without requiring additional personnel, thereby maintaining system safety while reducing operational complexity and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If field devices are made to differentiate between maintenance triggers and actual events, then appropriate reactions are enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappropriate reaction capabilityVSAvoidfield device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unique identifier acts as an intermediary signal between the test device and the field device/control unit. This intermediary mechanism enables field devices to differentiate between maintenance and actual events without requiring complex differentiation logic within the field devices themselves, thus maintaining ease of operation while minimizing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2817791B1Automatic maintenance detection in a processor device
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2817791B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2817791B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2817791B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a processor device system (100) with a maintenance function, which processor device system (100) has a processor device (111) with one or more field devices (101, 102, 103, 104) and at least one control unit (10). The processor device system (100) also has at least one testing device (121) for performing maintenance on the one field device or on at least one of the plurality of field devices. The at least one test device and/or the at least one field device is/are configured to inform the at least one control unit of imminent or commenced maintenance of the field device by the test device. The invention relates to a field device and to a test device which are each suitable for being used in the specified processor device system (100).