Processor Operation Fusing for Trace Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processor architectures face inefficiencies when translating instructions into operations, particularly in optimizing micro-operations and managing status flags and branch instructions, which can lead to suboptimal execution logic and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves a method of fusing operations within a processor, where instructions compatible with a reference architecture are translated and optimized into operations compatible with a target architecture, using a hardware translating agent, trace-building unit, and fusing agent to generate fused operations that reduce complexity and enhance execution efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If instructions are translated into multiple separate operations, then execution flexibility is improved, but device complexity and operation count increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution flexibilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate micro-operations into a single fused operation that performs multiple functions simultaneously. For example, a fused operation can perform arithmetic computation, update status flags, and modify registers in one atomic step, thereby reducing overall operation count and complexity while maintaining execution flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fused operation is designed to perform multiple functions that were previously handled by separate operations. A single fused operation can implement different computational tasks by varying its parameters, making the operation unit universal and reducing the need for specialized separate operations for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If separate operations are used for status flag updates and arithmetic operations, then operational precision is improved, but execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational precisionVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges status flag update operations with arithmetic operations into a single fused operation. This allows both the arithmetic computation and the status flag updates to occur simultaneously in one execution cycle rather than sequentially, maintaining operational precision while significantly reducing execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fused operation maintains continuous execution by performing multiple useful actions (arithmetic computation and status flag updates) without interruption or sequential stepping. The operation completes all required functions in a single atomic step, eliminating the time loss that would occur with separate sequential operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If multiple operations are executed sequentially, then operational correctness is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational correctnessVSAvoidexecution throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sequential operations into a single fused operation that maintains operational correctness through atomic execution. The fused operation ensures that all required transformations and status updates occur in a single atomic step, preventing intermediate incorrect states while executing faster than sequential operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fused operation maintains continuous and correct execution by performing all necessary operations in a single uninterrupted atomic step. This eliminates the sequential execution overhead and intermediate states that could introduce errors, while maintaining the correctness guarantees of sequential execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS7797517B1Trace optimization via fusing operations of a target architecture operation set
Publication Date: 2010.09.14 SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC
  • US7797517B1 patent drawing
  • US7797517B1 patent drawing
  • US7797517B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Reference architecture instructions are translated into target architecture operations. Sequences of operations, in a predicted execution order in some embodiments, form traces. In some embodiments, a trace is based on a plurality of basic blocks. In some embodiments, a trace is committed or aborted as a single entity. Sequences of operations are optimized by fusing collections of operations; fused operations specify a same observable function as respective collections, but advantageously enable more efficient processing. In some embodiments, a collection comprises multiple register operations. Fusing a register operation with a branch operation in a trace forms a fused reg-op/branch operation. In some embodiments, branch instructions translate into assert operations. Fusing an assert operation with another operation forms a fused assert operation. In some embodiments, fused operations only set architectural state, such as high-order portions of registers, that is subsequently read before being written.