Processor Transactional-Scout Mode for Pipeline Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern processors that support hardware transactional memory inefficiently utilize computational resources when encountering multiple failure conditions, leading to repeated transaction re-executions.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a transactional-scout mode allows processors to speculatively execute instructions after a transactional failure condition, continuing until the failure condition is resolved or the end of the protected section is reached, thereby avoiding immediate pipeline clearing and allowing for potential resolution of additional failure conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the processor immediately clears the pipeline and re-executes the transaction after encountering a failure condition, then the transaction atomicity is maintained, but the computational resources are used inefficiently due to repeated re-executions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction atomicityVSAvoidcomputational resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor performs preliminary actions by speculatively executing instructions in scout mode before the failure condition is fully resolved. This allows the processor to advance past the failure point and prepare for potential recovery, rather than immediately clearing the pipeline and restarting the transaction from the beginning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of interrupting execution flow completely when a failure condition is detected, the processor maintains continuity of useful action by continuing to execute instructions in scout mode. This allows productive work to continue even while handling the failure condition, rather than stalling until the failure is resolved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Speed

If the processor terminates the transaction immediately upon encountering a failure condition, then the failure is handled promptly, but useful work is lost and the transaction must be re-executed from the beginning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure handling speedVSAvoidtransaction re-execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processor skips directly past the failure condition by entering scout mode and continuing execution beyond the point where the failure was detected. This allows the processor to rush through the problematic section and potentially reach a state where the failure condition is resolved, avoiding the need to re-execute the entire transaction from the beginning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Solution Approach 2:

The scout mode acts as an intermediary execution state between normal transactional execution and complete transaction termination. This intermediate mode allows the processor to handle failure conditions more gracefully by continuing execution in a controlled manner, bridging the gap between immediate failure handling and maintaining transaction integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the processor clears the pipeline after a transactional failure, then the transactional instructions are removed from the pipeline, but subsequent dependent operations are delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransactional instruction correctnessVSAvoidsubsequent operation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor dynamically adjusts pipeline handling based on the failure condition status. Instead of uniformly clearing the pipeline for all failures, the system adaptively decides whether to clear or continue executing in scout mode, allowing flexible response to different failure scenarios and maintaining throughput when possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8327188B2Hardware transactional memory acceleration through multiple failure recovery
Publication Date: 2012.12.04 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US8327188B2 patent drawing
  • US8327188B2 patent drawing
  • US8327188B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described embodiments provide a processor (e.g., processor 102) for executing instructions. During execution, the processor starts by transactionally executing instructions from a protected section of program code. The processor then encounters a transactional failure condition while transactionally executing the instructions from the protected section of program code. In response to encountering the transactional failure condition, the processor enters a transactional-scout mode and speculatively executes subsequent instructions in the transactional-scout mode.