Processor State Preservation During Nuclear Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices in areas with increased atmospheric radiation levels, such as after nuclear events, face erratic operation due to radiation-induced shutdowns, leading to loss of processor state as volatile storage is lost upon reboot.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device system comprising a nuclear event detector, primary and backup power supplies, non-volatile storage, and a processor that switches between power sources based on radiation and power status signals to preserve the processor state and ensure continuous operation by using a backup power supply during radiation events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If the processor continues operation during nuclear events, then continuous operation is maintained, but processor state is lost due to radiation-induced shutdowns and volatile storage loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidprocessor state
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting nuclear events before they cause processor shutdown and immediately storing the current processor state to non-volatile storage. This proactive state preservation occurs during the nuclear event window, ensuring that when radiation-induced shutdown occurs, the processor can resume from the last saved state rather than losing all information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Non-volatile storage acts as an intermediary between the volatile processor memory and the external nuclear event environment. By transferring critical processor state information to this intermediate non-volatile storage medium, the system isolates the processor from radiation effects while maintaining the ability to restore operational state after shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system uses only primary power supply, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases during power events and nuclear events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation reliabilityVSAvoidpower supply system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backup power supply is pre-configured and pre-charged during normal operation, standing by in advance to take over when the primary power supply fails or during nuclear events. This preliminary preparation ensures immediate switchover capability without adding complex real-time power management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power supply parameter by switching from primary to backup power source based on detected conditions (power events or nuclear events). This parameter change enables the system to adapt to adverse conditions while maintaining a relatively simple overall architecture through conditional switching rather than complex continuous management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the processor saves state frequently to non-volatile storage, then processor state preservation is improved, but productivity decreases due to storage operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate preservationVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of frequently saving the entire processor state, the system applies local quality by selectively saving only critical processor state information to non-volatile storage. This targeted approach preserves essential state data while minimizing the time and resources required for storage operations, thus maintaining higher processing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs state saving as a preliminary action triggered by specific events (nuclear event detection) rather than continuously or at fixed intervals. This event-driven approach ensures state preservation occurs only when necessary, avoiding unnecessary storage operations that would reduce productivity during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10614053B2Storing processor states during nuclear events
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10614053B2 patent drawing
  • US10614053B2 patent drawing
  • US10614053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a system comprises a nuclear event detector (NED) to issue a nuclear event status signal, a primary power supply to issue a power status signal, a backup power supply, a non-volatile storage, and a processor coupled to the non-volatile storage and the NED and switchably coupled to the primary and backup power supplies. The processor is to store a state of the processor to the non-volatile storage based on the nuclear event status signal, and the processor is to selectively receive power from either the primary power supply or the backup power supply based on the nuclear event status signal and the power status signal.