Processor Availability Thresholding for Boot-Time Task Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During the bootup of a computing device, such as a vehicle head unit, various applications and services compete for processor resources, leading to high processing loads and inefficiencies in task execution.

Innovation Solution

A computing device determines processor availability by monitoring processor statistics and mode statistics, using equations to calculate an availability percentage, and schedules tasks only when the availability exceeds a specified threshold, ensuring efficient use of resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple applications and services execute tasks simultaneously during bootup, then the system provides comprehensive functionality, but the processing load increases and task execution efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidtask execution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of processor availability before scheduling tasks. The job scheduler checks processor statistics and mode statistics in advance to determine if processors can handle additional tasks, preventing overload before it occurs. This preliminary check ensures that tasks are only scheduled when processors are genuinely available, maintaining efficiency while providing comprehensive functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts task scheduling based on real-time processor availability. Rather than using a static scheduling approach, the job scheduler continuously monitors processor statistics and adapts its scheduling decisions accordingly. This dynamic approach allows the system to provide comprehensive functionality when processors are available while maintaining efficiency by pausing scheduling when processors are overloaded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the job scheduler continuously monitors processor availability, then task scheduling optimization is improved, but system overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask scheduling optimizationVSAvoidsystem overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the monitoring approach from continuous to event-driven based on processor mode transitions. Instead of continuously polling processor availability, the system monitors for specific mode changes (idle, busy, suspended) and only performs scheduling decisions when these mode changes occur. This parameter change in monitoring frequency significantly reduces system overhead while maintaining effective task scheduling optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The processor itself provides availability information through its mode statistics, eliminating the need for external continuous monitoring. The system leverages the processor's own self-reported statistics and mode changes to make scheduling decisions, reducing the overhead of external monitoring mechanisms while maintaining accurate task scheduling optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system pauses scheduling of new tasks during high load, then processor availability is preserved, but task completion time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor availabilityVSAvoidtask completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the job scheduler continuously receives updates on processor mode changes and adjusts scheduling decisions accordingly. When processors transition to idle mode, the scheduler immediately resumes task scheduling, minimizing delays. This feedback mechanism ensures processor availability is preserved during high load while reducing task completion time by quickly resuming scheduling when processors become available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic monitoring of processor mode changes rather than continuous pausing of task scheduling. Instead of maintaining a long-term pause during high load, the system periodically checks for mode transitions and resumes scheduling as soon as processors become available. This periodic action reduces the overall task completion time while still preserving processor availability during critical high-load periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12524325B2Real-time CPU availability monitoring
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12524325B2 patent drawing
  • US12524325B2 patent drawing
  • US12524325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more processors of a computing device may determine, based at least in part on one or more processor statistics and one or more processor mode statistics, a processor availability of the one or more processors. The one or more processors may determine, based at least in part on the processor availability of the one or more processors, whether the one or more processors are available to execute one or more tasks. The one or more processors may, in response to determining that the one or more processors are available to execute the one or more tasks, executing, by the one or more processors, the one or more tasks.