Procurement System Contract Compliance Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in maintaining compliance with supplier contracts and monitoring pricing in electronic procurement systems, particularly as automation leads to a loss of control over purchases made by individuals within the organization.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based procurement system that includes a processor and memory to receive audit parameters, search electronic supplier catalogs, compare prices against baselines or contract information, and generate reports on compliance, historical pricing, and purchase history, enabling real-time alerts and detailed analytical reports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If procurement systems are automated to allow individuals to order items, then productivity and ease of operation are improved, but control over purchases and compliance with contracts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocurement efficiencyVSAvoidcontract compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring purchases against contract parameters and providing real-time alerts when compliance issues are detected. The audit system generates reports that feed back to procurement personnel, enabling corrective action while maintaining automated procurement processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary audit system is introduced between the automated procurement process and contract compliance requirements. This intermediary layer automatically compares purchase data with contract parameters without interfering with the speed of procurement, thus maintaining productivity while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive audit and monitoring tools are implemented to ensure contract compliance, then reliability and control are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchase controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple audit functions (price comparison, contract compliance checking, historical analysis) into a single integrated system. By combining these functions, the system reduces overall complexity compared to having separate systems for each audit function, while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The audit system operates autonomously by automatically retrieving purchase data, comparing it with contract parameters, and generating compliance reports without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability reduces operational complexity while maintaining reliable purchase control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If detailed price comparison and historical analysis are performed, then measurement precision and detection accuracy are improved, but loss of time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprice monitoring accuracyVSAvoidaudit time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing contract parameters, price baselines, and compliance rules before audits are executed. This preparation work is done once and reused across multiple audits, enabling detailed price comparison without repeating the same setup work, thus maintaining precision while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The audit system operates continuously in the background, constantly monitoring purchases and comparing prices without requiring periodic manual intervention. This continuous operation maintains high measurement precision while eliminating the time loss associated with repeated manual audit processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10861069B2Methods and systems to maintain, check, report, and audit contract and historical pricing in electronic procurement
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 COUPA SOFTWARE INC
  • US10861069B2 patent drawing
  • US10861069B2 patent drawing
  • US10861069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments provide an electronic procurement system and process that enables a buyer or purchasing organization to maintain explicitly or implicitly, a contract price between the buyer/purchasing organization and the supplier whose catalog is integrated with an electronic marketplace. In one embodiment, a process is executed to compare the listed/purchase price of catalog items against the contract price or against a ‘normal’ purchase price. A user (e.g. the buyer) may also be able to configure and receive specific alerts regarding items that are purchased in deviation of the contracted price and items that have been added to the catalog since the last contract. Disclosed embodiments may also maintain, automatically, the historical price and purchase information of supplier catalog items that are enabled through the electronic marketplace. The user may be able to view a history of prices at which the supplier catalog item was listed in the catalogs as well as purchased by users in the same organization.