Automated Produced Water Treatment with Dynamic Ozone Dosing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating produced water from oil and gas operations are inefficient in dynamically adjusting to changing water quality and fail to effectively remove contaminants and improve separation processes, while also not adequately addressing carbon sequestration needs.

Innovation Solution

An automated treatment system that injects ozone or an ozone-oxygen mixture upstream of separators, with dynamic dose rate adjustment based on real-time monitoring, and incorporates nano-bubble technology for friction reduction and carbon sequestration by introducing carbon dioxide in nanobubble form.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional produced water treatment methods are used, then basic separation is achieved, but the system cannot dynamically adjust to changing water quality and treatment efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment capabilityVSAvoidtreatment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic dosing of ozone based on real-time monitoring of water quality parameters, allowing the treatment process to adapt to changing produced water characteristics. The ozone injection rate is continuously adjusted to match the actual contamination level, ensuring optimal treatment efficiency under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous monitoring of produced water quality and uses this feedback to automatically adjust ozone dosing rates. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to quality changes and maintain high treatment efficiency dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If produced water is injected into disposal wells, then waste disposal is achieved, but high pump pressure increases operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoidpump pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical energy consumption (high pump pressure) with chemical treatment (ozone oxidation and nanobubble generation). By modifying the water's physical-chemical properties through oxidation and nanobubble formation, the system reduces friction and resistance in the injection system, thereby lowering the mechanical energy required for pumping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of the produced water including oxidation state (through ozone), gas content (nanobubbles), and surface properties. These parameter changes reduce friction and improve flow characteristics, leading to lower pump pressure requirements for well injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If ozone is injected at high doses, then contaminant removal is improved, but energy consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant removal effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies ozone dosing at the minimum effective level rather than excessive doses. By using continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment, the system achieves adequate contaminant removal with partial action, avoiding the complexities and costs associated with high-dose continuous treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Quantity of substance

If carbon dioxide is injected into produced water, then carbon sequestration is achieved, but gas solubility limits restrict the amount of carbon that can be stored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon storage capacityVSAvoidgas solubility limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes phase transition of carbon dioxide from gas to dissolved state through nanobubble formation. The nanobubble technology creates a large surface area for gas-liquid interface, dramatically increasing the solubility and storage capacity of carbon dioxide in produced water beyond conventional limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs nanobubbles as a porous-like structure with extremely high surface area to volume ratio. This nanoscale porous structure provides extensive interface for carbon dioxide dissolution, enabling supersaturated storage of carbon in the produced water.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively clarifies produced water by removing suspended matter, reduces injection/disposal well pump pressure, and enhances carbon sequestration by maintaining supersaturated carbon dioxide in produced water, thereby improving treatment efficiency and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The ozone is consumed rapidly by bacteria, iron, sulfides and other reducers in the produced water stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

The oxygen bubbles provide lift, floats lighter solids, and improves the oil/water separation process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 3

The oxygen bubbles in the produced water provides an Induced Gas Flotation (IGF) effect in the downstream separators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduced Gas Flotation: Froth Floatation

Implementation Method 4

introducing carbon dioxide in nanobubble form... reduces injection/disposal well pump pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS20240083788A1System for friction reduction with carbon sequestration
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 HYDROZONIX LLC
  • US20240083788A1 patent drawing
  • US20240083788A1 patent drawing
  • US20240083788A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated produced water treatment system that injects ozone or an ozone-oxygen mixture upstream of produced water separators, with the dose rate changing dynamically as the produced water quality changes, as determined by continuous monitoring of the produced water quality by a plurality of sensors that detect water quality parameters in real time. The system may operate as a “slipstream” injection system. Ozone and/or nitrogen micro-bubbles and/or nano-bubbles may be introduced for friction reduction in oil and gas operations. Carbon dioxide in the form of nanobubbles is used to supersaturate treated produced water. The supersaturated produced water is then injected into Class II injection wells for effective storage in underground formations in conjunction with enhanced recovery operations or the storage and disposal of produced water.