Intelligent Product Assignment System for Fulfillment Center Backlog Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fulfillment centers face backlogs due to inadequate distribution of incoming products among multiple centers, leading to productivity losses and increased costs from hiring additional workers to manage the backlog.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that intelligently assigns product quantities to fulfillment centers based on real-world constraints using a set of rules and logistical regression models, optimizing product distribution and reducing the need for excessive labor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If more workers are hired to handle backlogs at fulfillment centers, then productivity increases, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fulfillment network into multiple fulfillment centers and intelligently distributes incoming products across these segments based on real-time capacity, product attributes, and operational constraints. This segmentation allows the system to handle higher volumes without proportionally increasing labor at any single center, thereby improving productivity while controlling operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assignment of products to fulfillment centers before actual receipt, using predictive analytics and constraint-based optimization. By pre-distributing products across multiple centers based on forecasted demand and current capacity, the system prevents backlogs from forming, improving productivity without the need for emergency labor deployment and associated cost increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If products are distributed to multiple fulfillment centers, then backlog problems are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacklog reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal assignment framework that handles multiple fulfillment centers, product types, and constraint conditions through a single integrated platform. This multi-functional system manages product distribution across the entire network using standardized processes and data structures, reducing backlog problems while keeping system complexity manageable through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary assignment layer between product receipt and fulfillment center allocation. This intermediary system translates complex distribution requirements into actionable assignments by evaluating product attributes, center capacities, and operational constraints, thereby reducing backlogs while managing complexity through a dedicated mediation layer rather than direct complex point-to-point control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If intelligent product assignment is implemented, then inventory optimization is achieved, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory optimizationVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial optimization by focusing computational resources on the most critical assignment decisions and high-value products, rather than attempting to optimize every single product assignment equally. This approach achieves significant inventory optimization benefits while limiting computational requirements by applying intensive processing only where it provides the greatest marginal return.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts assignment parameters such as priority weights, capacity thresholds, and constraint strictness based on current operational conditions, product characteristics, and demand patterns. By changing parameters rather than recalculating entire optimization models, the system achieves effective inventory optimization while reducing computational requirements through adaptive parameter tuning instead of exhaustive recalculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11810016B2Computer-implemented systems and methods for optimization of a product inventory by intelligent distribution of inbound products using product assignment validation
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 COUPANG CORP
  • US11810016B2 patent drawing
  • US11810016B2 patent drawing
  • US11810016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods for intelligent distribution of products are disclosed. The systems and methods may be configured to: receive a request to assign a product to a location; retrieve a plurality of attributes associated with the product from a system configured to store attributes of products; retrieve a plurality of rules from a rules system configured to store rules implemented for assigning a product to a location, the retrieved plurality of rules configured by a user using a user interface; determining the location to store the product by applying the retrieved plurality of attributes to the retrieved plurality of rules; and assigning the product to the determined location.