Product Bundle Prediction for Region-Specific Revenue Uplift

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Merchants face difficulty in determining which payment methods and platform features to offer their customers, as these choices impact sales and costs, especially when expanding to new markets with different cultural and geographic preferences, and existing case studies are not relevant to individual merchant circumstances.

Innovation Solution

A computing model is developed to predict revenue uplift for merchants by training revenue uplift specific models on historical transaction data and A/B testing data, accounting for overlap between payment methods and features, and providing user interfaces for exploring and recommending optimal combinations to maximize revenue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If merchants offer multiple payment methods and platform features to expand customer reach, then revenue potential increases, but decision complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer reachVSAvoiddecision complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables merchants to independently evaluate and select optimal payment method bundles by providing automated revenue uplift predictions. The computer system processes merchant-specific features and historical data to generate tailored recommendations, allowing merchants to make informed decisions without relying on external consultants or manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates A/B testing data and historical transaction data to continuously refine revenue uplift predictions. By comparing actual performance against predictions and updating models with new data, the system provides progressively more accurate feedback to merchants about which payment method combinations yield the highest revenue uplift for their specific circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If merchants adopt payment methods popular in target markets, then revenue uplift increases, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue upliftVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by training revenue uplift specific models on historical data and A/B testing data before merchants make implementation decisions. These pre-trained models evaluate various payment method combinations and predict revenue outcomes, allowing merchants to plan implementations based on proven high-performing bundles rather than experimenting with untested configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts recommendations by adjusting parameters based on merchant-specific features such as business type, market region, and transaction characteristics. Rather than providing generic payment method lists, the system dynamically modifies predictions to account for individual merchant circumstances, ensuring recommendations are optimized for each merchant's specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If existing case studies are used to guide payment method selection, then implementation time is reduced, but relevance to individual merchant circumstances is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation timeVSAvoidrelevance to merchant circumstances
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from generic case studies to localized, merchant-specific predictions by incorporating individual merchant features into the revenue uplift calculation. Each merchant receives tailored recommendations based on their specific business type, market region, and transaction patterns, ensuring the advice is locally optimized rather than universally applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the merchant population into distinct groups based on features such as business type and market region, then applies specialized revenue uplift models to each segment. This segmentation allows the system to provide customized recommendations for different merchant categories while maintaining efficiency through standardized processing within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250371564A1Customized product bundles
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 STRIPE LLC
  • US20250371564A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371564A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371564A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving one or more features characterizing; a first user; one or more features characterizing a geographic region; and a selection of product offerings offered by a platform; computing specific predictions for the selection of product offerings to be adopted by the first user, each specific prediction being computed for a corresponding product offering of the selection of product offerings by: selecting a specific model for the corresponding product offering corresponding to the one or more features characterizing the geographic region, trained based on training data collected by the platform; and supplying the one or more features characterizing the first user to the specific model to compute the specific prediction; and computing an aggregated prediction from adopting the selection of product offerings based on the specific predictions, the aggregated prediction being smaller than the sum of the specific predictions for the selection of product offerings.