Product Dimension Correction via Container Utilization Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In materials handling systems, selecting appropriate containers for items is challenging due to inaccurate item dimension values, leading to increased costs, human error, and inefficiencies in space utilization and shipping, especially when dealing with diverse and changing inventory items.

Innovation Solution

A product dimension correction system that uses a computing system to store and update item dimension values by comparing actual and recommended containers, initiating measurements when discrepancies are detected, and adjusting confidence levels to ensure accurate container selection and optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual measurement of items is performed to obtain accurate dimensions, then measurement precision improves, but productivity deteriorates due to increased labor time and costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem dimension accuracyVSAvoidpackaging throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of item dimensions when items are first received at the materials handling facility. These pre-measured dimensions are stored in a database and automatically retrieved for future packaging operations, eliminating the need for repeated manual measurements while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of physically measuring each item during packaging, the system uses digital copies of dimension data stored in a database. This virtual representation of item dimensions allows rapid container selection without physical measurement, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining measurement precision through automated scanning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If visual assessment is used to select containers, then ease of operation improves, but measurement precision deteriorates leading to inappropriate container selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer selection simplicityVSAvoiddimension accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical/visual assessment process with an automated computer-based system. The container selection software automatically retrieves item dimensions from the database, calculates the appropriate container size, and provides recommendations, eliminating human visual assessment errors while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary software layer between the item and the container selection process. This software intermediary automatically retrieves stored dimension data, processes it through container selection algorithms, and provides recommendations to operators, thereby eliminating the need for direct visual assessment while keeping the process simple and user-friendly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If vendor-provided dimension values are used, then productivity improves by eliminating measurement steps, but measurement precision deteriorates due to potential inaccuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging efficiencyVSAvoiddimension reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where container selection accuracy is continuously monitored. When items are packaged, the system compares the selected container dimensions with the actual item dimensions. If discrepancies are detected, the system flags the vendor-provided dimension data for review and can automatically adjust the stored values, ensuring ongoing precision while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of dimension parameters based on feedback from actual packaging operations. When vendor-provided dimensions result in poor container fits, the system modifies the stored dimension values to reflect actual measurements, thereby maintaining productivity while improving measurement precision through iterative parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7873549B1Product dimension correction
Publication Date: 2011.01.18 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US7873549B1 patent drawing
  • US7873549B1 patent drawing
  • US7873549B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for automatically correcting item dimension values may facilitate operations of a materials handling facility. Such a method may include recommending a container for handling one or more items dependent on currently stored item dimension values and determining if any of the item values are inaccurate dependent on an actual container used to handle the one or more items. In some embodiments, the method may include calculating a volumetric utilization of an actual and a recommended container and comparing the two utilizations to determine if the recommended container was too large or too small. If the recommended container was too large or too small, the method may include flagging one or more of the items for measurement and/or correcting item dimensions for one or more of the items. Items may be flagged for measurement in response to a single mismatch between recommended and actual containers or multiple mismatches.