Online Product Recommendations via Visual Saliency Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current on-line recommendation systems face challenges such as the 'cold start problem' due to lack of user browsing history, insufficient content coverage, and system complexity, leading to suboptimal user engagement and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

The system employs visual saliency maps and feature extraction techniques to identify regions of interest in product images, combined with visual-bag-of-words processing and ranking functions to provide personalized product recommendations based on user preferences and contextual similarity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional recommendation systems rely on user browsing history and search habits, then personalization is improved, but the cold start problem occurs when users lack sufficient browsing history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy for new users
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces visual features of product images as an intermediary element that bridges the gap between user preferences and product recommendations. Instead of relying solely on user browsing history, the system extracts visual features from product images and uses them to generate recommendations, especially for new users without sufficient historical data. This intermediary approach allows the system to personalize recommendations based on visual product characteristics rather than requiring extensive user history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system processes only annotated product images, then recommendation accuracy is improved, but manual annotation efforts and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidmanual annotation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the system automatically extracts visual features from product images without requiring manual annotation. The visual feature extraction process operates autonomously on unannotated images, eliminating the need for human annotators to label product characteristics. This self-service approach maintains recommendation accuracy by using automated computer vision techniques to identify and extract relevant visual features directly from the images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual image annotation with an automated computer vision system. Instead of having human annotators manually label product images, the system uses algorithms to automatically extract visual features such as color, texture, shape, and other visual characteristics. This substitution of mechanical human labor with automated computational processes significantly reduces annotation time and costs while maintaining or improving recommendation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses comprehensive content analysis, then content coverage is improved, but system complexity increases due to labor-intensive implementations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent coverageVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex task of content analysis into distinct visual feature extraction components. Instead of attempting comprehensive content analysis through labor-intensive methods, the system divides the process into separate automated steps: image preprocessing, feature detection, feature extraction, and feature representation. Each segment handles a specific aspect of visual analysis, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive content coverage through the coordinated operation of these modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11151630B2On-line product related recommendations
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US11151630B2 patent drawing
  • US11151630B2 patent drawing
  • US11151630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example methods, apparatuses, and/or articles of manufacture are disclosed that may be implemented, in whole or in part, using one or more computing devices to facilitate or support one or more processes and/or operations for one or more on-line recommendations, such as product-related recommendations, for example.