Product Review Navigation System with Learning Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional review websites require users to search and navigate individually between product reviews, making it difficult for potential consumers to efficiently compare and select products by navigating a collection of editorial content related to similar products from various manufacturers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that allows seamless, continuous access to relevant product reviews using navigational buttons and a learning engine to present the next relevant similar product, eliminating the need for users to search for similar products, by aggregating and displaying editorial content based on shared and exclusive attributes of products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users search and navigate individually between product reviews on conventional websites, then they can access editorial content, but it becomes difficult to efficiently compare and select products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of navigationVSAvoidtime for product comparison
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the navigation process by introducing navigational buttons that divide the review collection into manageable sections (current review, previous review, next review). This segmentation allows users to access specific reviews without searching through the entire collection, reducing navigation time and effort while maintaining comprehensive access to editorial content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-organizing reviews into a structured collection with navigational buttons before the user needs to access them. The learning engine also pre-processes product attributes to enable automatic filtering and sorting, so when users need to compare products, the system is already prepared to deliver relevant reviews without requiring users to perform time-consuming search operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If users manually search for similar products, then they can find relevant reviews, but the process is complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to relevant reviewsVSAvoidsearch navigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (the learning engine and navigational interface) that mediates between the user's product selection needs and the large collection of editorial content. Instead of requiring users to manually search through all reviews, the learning engine acts as an intelligent intermediary that automatically filters and presents relevant reviews based on product attributes, simplifying the information access process while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user interactions with the navigational buttons and product selections are fed back to the learning engine. This feedback loop enables the system to continuously improve its understanding of user preferences and product relationships, making the review collection increasingly relevant and easier to navigate over time, thereby reducing the complexity of information search.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the system aggregates and displays editorial content based on shared and exclusive attributes, then product comparison is simplified, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct research efficiencyVSAvoidcontent aggregation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using the learning engine to dynamically adjust and optimize the attributes used for aggregating and filtering editorial content. Instead of using fixed, complex aggregation rules, the system adapts product attributes and review criteria based on user preferences, product categories, and contextual information. This dynamic parameter adjustment simplifies the user experience and improves research efficiency while managing system complexity through intelligent automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10395291B2System and method for navigating a collection of editorial content
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 CBS INTERACTIVE INC
  • US10395291B2 patent drawing
  • US10395291B2 patent drawing
  • US10395291B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for easily navigating a collection of editorial content related to products are described. Embodiments of the invention provide seamless, continuous, structured access to relevant product reviews. Users of embodiments of the invention can advance from one product review to another by selecting navigational buttons representing the previous and next product reviews from within a product review currently being viewed. The previous product review represents the review the user was viewing prior to the currently viewed review. The next product review is determined based on a simple learning engine that presents the next relevant product, along with another relevant product that is, for example, either cheaper or more expensive than the review being currently viewed. This simplifies the user experience by eliminating the need to go back to a listing page to research products similar to the product whose review is being viewed.