Automated Product Specification Compliance System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for configuring and pricing products do not account for location-specific requirements, leading to noncompliant products and increased manual checks, which are time-consuming and prone to human error.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that receive a location for product use, assess compliance with regional requirements, and automatically adjust product specifications to ensure compliance, including notifying users of rule violations and suggesting solutions, using data files with region-specific information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional automated product configuration systems are used, then product specification creation is efficient and automated, but the products fail to meet regional compliance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated product specification creationVSAvoidregional compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring compliance rules and regional requirements into the automated specification tool before product configuration begins. This allows the automated system to proactively ensure compliance rather than requiring post-configuration manual checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the automated specification tool continuously checks configuration options against regional compliance rules and provides real-time feedback to users about compliance status, allowing immediate correction of non-compliant selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual checks and amendments are added to ensure compliance, then regional requirements are met, but the process time increases significantly and human error risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregional complianceVSAvoidspecification creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service compliance checking where the automated tool independently verifies configurations against regional rules without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by automatically detecting and flagging compliance issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical checking processes with automated computational verification. Instead of human staff manually reviewing specifications against compliance rules, the system uses automated algorithms to perform the same function faster and more reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual checks and amendments are added to ensure compliance, then regional requirements are met, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregional complianceVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges compliance checking functionality directly into the product specification tool, combining what were previously separate processes (configuration and compliance verification) into a single integrated system. This reduces overall process complexity despite adding compliance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-functionality where the specification tool simultaneously performs product configuration, compliance checking, and rule verification in a single platform. This universal approach eliminates the need for separate manual compliance processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7844622B1System and method for maintaining a product specification within regional parameters when selecting options
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US7844622B1 patent drawing
  • US7844622B1 patent drawing
  • US7844622B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method of computer generating a product specification. The specification is dependent on the selection of a number of options by a consumer. The method utilizes a computer program which receives from user a location in which said product will be used. After that, the user is allowed to select product options. Information regarding rules and regulations for that particular location is made available from separately identified data files on a server. Options required in that particular locations will be automatically added to the specification. When additional options are selected, the program determines whether the product is still in compliance in the location selected. If the added option results in the specification running afoul of a regional rule or regulation, the user will be notified, and advised as to how the violation can be overcome. Once the user is satisfied with the options, and these options are in compliance, the specification is completed and useful for making an order.