Production Equipment Sizing Using Consumption-Based Demand Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for sizing production equipment at manufacturing locations are subjective, computationally intensive, and inaccurate, leading to inefficiencies in meeting demand and optimizing output while minimizing waste and energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The development of optimization software that uses computationally efficient models to determine the cumulative consumption of components at production locations, automatically selecting and deploying appropriate production equipment to match demand, and controlling equipment operation based on consumption patterns to optimize output and energy use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional subjective methods are used to size production equipment, then equipment selection is simple, but accuracy and efficiency of meeting demand deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of equipment sizingVSAvoidcomplexity of sizing method
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional subjective mechanical sizing methods with an automated computational system that uses machine learning models and algorithms to objectively determine optimal equipment sizing, thereby improving accuracy while managing complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing equipment sizing calculations without requiring expert intervention, using automated demand forecasting and computational models to determine optimal equipment capacity independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If computationally intensive methods are used to optimize production, then accuracy of demand prediction improves, but computational efficiency and speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of demand predictionVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models on historical data and pre-calculating demand patterns, so that when actual sizing is needed, the computations are already prepared and can be applied quickly without intensive real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by focusing computational resources on the most critical parameters and using approximations for less critical factors, achieving sufficient accuracy without requiring exhaustive computation of all possible variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If production equipment is oversized to meet peak demand, then demand satisfaction improves, but waste and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to meet demandVSAvoidwaste from overproduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by enabling flexible, adjustable production equipment that can dynamically scale output based on real-time demand signals, rather than relying on fixed oversized capacity, thereby meeting peak demand without continuous overproduction and waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring actual demand and consumption patterns, then adjusting production levels in real-time to match demand, preventing both overproduction and underproduction through closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of substance

If production equipment is undersized to minimize waste, then waste reduction improves, but ability to meet demand deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste from overproductionVSAvoidability to meet demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by forecasting future demand using machine learning models before production occurs, allowing equipment to be sized appropriately for anticipated demand rather than relying on historical averages or conservative estimates, thus meeting demand without excessive capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11796969B1Optimizing manufacturing of physical components
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 STARBUCKS CORPORATION
  • US11796969B1 patent drawing
  • US11796969B1 patent drawing
  • US11796969B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing process for physical components can be optimized using some techniques described herein. For example, a system can receive, via a graphical user interface, a user selection of a particular type of production location. The system can determine a cumulative consumption of a component at the particular type of production location over a particular time window. The system can analyze a group of candidate types of production equipment to identify a particular type of production equipment that can accommodate the cumulative consumption of the component during the particular time window. And the system can execute one or more computing operations configured to facilitate deployment of the particular type of production equipment at the particular type of production location.