Production Line Control Condition Determination via Historical Data Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturers face challenges in determining suitable control conditions for production lines due to complex control combinations and reliance on experiential methods, which often result in inefficient yield improvements and excessive adjustment costs.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that divide historical control condition sets into groups, calculate central tendency, degree of variation, and weight scores to select a suitable control condition set, reducing the need for experiential adjustments and minimizing excessive factor overload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manufacturers rely on experiential methods to set control conditions, then they can make decisions based on practitioner knowledge, but the yield related values can only be improved after many times of adjustment and the process is extremely dependent on individual experiences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield related valuesVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by dividing historical control condition sets into groups and calculating measurements of central tendency and weight scores before actual production. This pre-computation of optimal conditions based on historical data eliminates the need for multiple trial adjustments during production, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability improvement and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of historical control conditions and their outcomes, analyzing patterns in the data to determine optimal control condition sets. This copying and analysis of historical patterns replaces reliance on individual practitioner experiences and enables systematic optimization without repeated trial adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If manufacturers design an experimental method to obtain an optimal control condition set, then they can find optimal control conditions after many experiments, but applying the optimal control condition set to an on-site production line is usually infeasible due to restrictions in range, variation amount, and adjustability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal control condition setVSAvoidapplicability to on-site production line
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates weight scores for different groups of control conditions, allowing each control factor to have locally optimized conditions based on historical performance. This enables the selection of optimal control condition sets that are specifically tailored to the actual constraints and characteristics of the on-site production line, rather than applying a single global optimal solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system analyzes historical control condition sets to identify patterns and determines optimal control conditions by changing parameters based on measured central tendency and weight scores. This data-driven parameter optimization ensures that the determined control condition sets are both optimal and feasible for on-site production line constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the control condition set includes many control factors with different conditions, then the yield related values can be improved, but the production line may become overloaded and the complexity of control combinations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield related valuesVSAvoidcontrol combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex control condition sets into multiple groups based on control factors and their conditions. By dividing the historical control condition sets into groups and calculating weight scores for each group, the system manages complexity systematically while identifying the most effective control combinations for improving yield related values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10444741B2Apparatus and method thereof for determining a control condition set of a production line
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION INDUSTRY
  • US10444741B2 patent drawing
  • US10444741B2 patent drawing
  • US10444741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and a method thereof for determining a control condition set of a production line. The apparatus divides several historical control condition sets into several groups, wherein the historical control conditions corresponding to the same control factor are the same in each group. For each group, the apparatus calculates a measurement of central tendency according to the historical yield related values in the group. The apparatus decides a subset of the groups. For each group in the subset, the apparatus calculates a degree of variation and a number regarding the different control conditions between the control condition set and the group. The apparatus calculates weight scores. Based on the measurements of central tendency and the weight scores, the apparatus selects one of the groups as a selected group and assigns the historical control conditions of the selected group as the control conditions of the control condition set.