Production Line Start-Stop Controller for Energy Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current production lines lack efficient energy-saving and environmentally friendly start-stop systems, leading to significant energy wastage during downtime, as existing control technologies and architectures are inadequate for seamless shutdown and restart processes.

Innovation Solution

A centralized or decentralized start-stop controller system that integrates energy and machine controllers, using fieldbuses or Ethernet for data transmission, manages energy and media supplies to enable automatic and efficient startup and shutdown of production lines, with defined sequences and timer controls to minimize energy consumption and ensure smooth operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the production line is shut down during downtime, then energy consumption is reduced, but restarting the production line becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidrestart complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary actions during the shutdown phase by automatically executing a predefined restart sequence. The master controller stores and retrieves startup parameters and machine states, preparing the system in advance for rapid restart without manual intervention, thus reducing both energy waste during downtime and restart complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The production line control system serves itself by automatically managing the shutdown and restart processes. The master controller autonomously coordinates all machines and processing units, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention during restart, thereby simplifying operation while enabling energy-efficient shutdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If all systems remain fully operational during downtime, then immediate production resumption is enabled, but large amounts of energy are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction resumption speedVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the operational state of machines and processing units based on the anticipated downtime duration. For short downtimes, systems remain in a reduced-power ready state; for longer downtimes, they enter deeper shutdown modes. This dynamic adaptation enables immediate resumption when needed while minimizing energy waste during extended idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The master controller changes operational parameters of connected machines and processing units based on downtime predictions. Parameters such as power consumption levels, media supply rates, and machine readiness states are adjusted according to the expected duration of interruption, optimizing the balance between energy savings and production resumption speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If a start-stop system is implemented for the production line, then energy efficiency is improved, but the control architecture and energy supply infrastructure become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The master controller is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the central production line controller and as the start-stop system controller. By integrating the energy management functions into the existing master controller architecture, the system achieves improved energy efficiency without adding separate complex control infrastructure, thus minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2279462B1Method and arrangement for controlling a production line
Publication Date: 2015.07.08 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2279462B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention proposes a method and an arrangement for controlling a production line (1) generally having a multiplicity of processing units or machines (2,3,4) which are controlled, via a master controller (11), using data provided by a production planning system (12). In addition to a machine controller (5), each machine (2,3,4) contains a power controller (6) which is supplied with data by a master power controller (10) as part of the master controller (11). The master controller (11) is provided with a master machine controller (16) which is extended with functions for starting and stopping the production line (1) such that a current production process of the production line (1) is concluded such that an automatic restart can be carried out after the production line (1) has been at a standstill. Furthermore, the master power controller (10) is designed with functions for starting and stopping the production line (1) such that the power for the individual machines (2,3,4) is increased and decreased in a defined manner, with the result that an automatic restart can be carried out after the production line (1) has been at a standstill.