Production Recipe Optimization for Multi-Step Bioprocesses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processes for producing chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnological products fail to accurately account for the complex interplay of factors influencing production outcomes, often relying on simplistic approaches that underestimate non-linear dynamics and lack comprehensive integration of available knowledge.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method determines optimal recipes for production processes by considering multiple factors and available knowledge, using recipe parameters to control the execution of steps in bioreactors, and employing simulations to explore a wide range of alternatives for optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional simplistic optimization approaches focusing on single set-point targets are used, then the optimization process is easier to implement, but the accuracy of accounting for complex interplay between factors is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of accounting for complex factorsVSAvoidcomplexity of optimization approach
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex production process into multiple discrete steps, each with its own recipe parameters. The optimization is performed step-by-step through sequential experimentation, where each step's parameters are optimized independently while considering their impact on subsequent steps. This segmentation allows the complex multi-factor optimization problem to be broken down into manageable sub-problems that can be solved iteratively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic optimization where recipe parameters are not fixed but are adjusted iteratively based on experimental results. The system continuously refines parameter values across multiple experimentation cycles, adapting the optimization strategy based on observed outcomes. This dynamic approach allows the system to capture non-linear relationships and complex interactions between parameters that static single-set-point methods miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If available knowledge about the process is integrated in a rudimental manner with a priori selected models, then the implementation is simpler, but the effective integration of knowledge is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffective integration of available knowledgeVSAvoidease of implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-driven optimization system where experimental results from each step are fed back into the optimization process. The system uses observed outcomes to refine parameter selections for subsequent experiments, continuously improving the integration of process knowledge. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual process behavior and adjust its model and parameter selections accordingly, rather than relying solely on a priori assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary experimentation and analysis to build an initial understanding of the process before full-scale optimization. Initial experiments are conducted to identify key parameters and their relationships, which then inform the selection of models and parameter ranges for subsequent optimization cycles. This preliminary action allows the system to incorporate available knowledge effectively while preparing for more rigorous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If maximisation of product titre is pursued as the single target, then the optimization focus is clearer, but the overall process performance is not optimised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct titreVSAvoidoverall process performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously across different steps of the production process, not just those directly affecting product titre. By changing and optimizing parameters at each step (temperature, pH, mixing conditions, timing) while considering their interrelationships, the system achieves better overall process performance. This multi-parameter optimization approach ensures that titre maximization does not compromise other critical performance aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the optimization from a single-dimension (product titre) to multi-dimensional optimization by incorporating multiple performance criteria and process steps. The system evaluates and optimizes parameters across the entire process workflow, considering interactions between different steps and their combined impact on overall performance. This dimensional expansion allows the system to balance titre maximization with other performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20230168662A1Optimisation of processes for the production of chemical, pharmaceutical and/or biotechnological products
Publication Date: 2023.06.01 THE AUTOMATION PARTNERSHIP (CAMBRIDGE) LTD
  • US20230168662A1 patent drawing
  • US20230168662A1 patent drawing
  • US20230168662A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of determining at least one recipe for a production process to produce a chemical, pharmaceutical and/or biotechnological product is provided, wherein the production process is defined by a plurality of steps specified by recipe parameter(s) controlling an execution of the production process and a recipe comprises the plurality of steps defining the production process.