Profile Evaluation for User Device Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems face challenges in selecting appropriate profiles for data transmission over noisy channels, as they are vulnerable to interference and noise, making it difficult to maintain effective communication quality.

Innovation Solution

A computing device evaluates profiles by analyzing received signals and performing simulations to predict communication vulnerability, using simulated evaluation parameters to determine the best modulation profiles for user devices, thereby adapting to different channel environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is transmitted over noisy transmission channels using existing profiles, then data communication can be established, but the communication becomes vulnerable to interference and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidvulnerability to interference and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and evaluation of profile performance in noisy channel environments before actual data transmission. By predicting vulnerability using simulated evaluation parameters, the system pre-identifies suitable profiles that can withstand interference, thereby improving communication reliability while avoiding transmission using vulnerable profiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simulation results and analysis of received signals as feedback to continuously evaluate and select optimal profiles. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing channel conditions and maintain reliable communication by selecting profiles with predicted low vulnerability to interference and noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If appropriate profiles are selected for noisy channel environments, then communication vulnerability is reduced, but profile selection becomes difficult without simulation evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication vulnerabilityVSAvoidprofile selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simulated copies of actual transmission channels and profiles to evaluate performance without requiring extensive real-world testing. By using simulation models that replicate channel conditions, the system can predict profile vulnerability and make informed selections without the complexity of exhaustive empirical evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes evaluation parameters by using simulated evaluation parameters derived from signal analysis and simulation results. This allows the system to assess profile suitability based on predicted performance metrics rather than relying on complex manual selection processes, thereby reducing selection complexity while identifying profiles with low vulnerability to interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20200389239A1Profile evaluation for user device
Publication Date: 2020.12.10 COMCAST CABLE COMM LLC
  • US20200389239A1 patent drawing
  • US20200389239A1 patent drawing
  • US20200389239A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods are described for evaluating profiles used for communication with a user device. A computing device may receive a signal associated with a profile. The computing device may analyze the received signal, and may determine, based on the analysis of the received signal, a simulation configuration associated with the profile. A simulation associated with the profile may be performed. The computing device may request or cause, based on the simulation, a change of the profile.