Profile Rod Additive Manufacturing for High-Deposition Fiber Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies using fused filament fabrication face limitations such as small filament diameters, which restrict deposition rates, require complex methods for fiber-reinforced materials, and lead to issues like fiber breakage and nozzle clogging due to degradation of thermoplastic material.

Innovation Solution

An additive manufacturing device and method utilizing pre-tailored, pre-impregnated profile rods with larger diameters and adaptable cross-sections, which are fed into the printing system to improve deposition rates and reduce material degradation, allowing for continuous operation and easier nozzle cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If small diameter filaments (0.8mm-3mm) are used to enable winding and guiding, then the filament can be fed through the system, but the deposition rate is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition rateVSAvoidfilament diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the diameter parameter of the filament from conventional small sizes (0.8mm-3mm) to large diameter profile rods (5mm-20mm). This parameter change enables significantly higher deposition rates while the profiled cross-section and heating system design ensure proper melting and feeding of the larger material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the continuous filament into discrete profile rod segments that are fed individually into the heating system. Each profile rod is processed separately through melting and extrusion, eliminating the need for continuous winding and guiding of long filaments while maintaining high deposition rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If fiber-reinforced filaments are used, then material strength is improved, but cutting operations are required which interrupt continuous printing and may cause fiber breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber reinforcementVSAvoidcontinuous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-impregnating the profile rods with fiber-reinforced material before printing. The fibers are already integrated into the profile rod structure, eliminating the need for cutting operations during printing and maintaining continuous operation while preserving fiber reinforcement benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the cutting operation from the printing process by using pre-cut profile rods as input material. The cutting function is performed beforehand on the profile rods outside the printing system, allowing the printing process itself to operate continuously without interruption or fiber breakage risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If thick filaments are used to increase deposition rate, then material throughput is improved, but the filament requires longer heating time which increases degradation risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial throughputVSAvoidheating time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the heating parameters and heating zone design to accommodate thick profile rods. The heating system is optimized with increased heating power and extended heating zone length, reducing the heating time required for thick materials while maintaining control over degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dimensional changes by using profiled cross-sections (rectangular, triangular, etc.) instead of circular filaments. This dimensional change increases the surface area to volume ratio of the material, improving heat transfer efficiency and reducing heating time while maintaining large material throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If continuous filament is used, then material flow is maintained, but degraded material accumulates at the nozzle exit and cleaning becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flow continuityVSAvoidnozzle cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the material feed into discrete profile rod units. Each profile rod is fed, melted, and extruded as a separate unit, creating natural interruption points in the material flow. This segmentation allows for easier cleaning of degraded material from the nozzle between segments, while maintaining continuous overall production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by feeding profile rods in discrete intervals rather than continuous flow. Between each profile rod processing cycle, the nozzle can be cleaned or maintained, preventing accumulation of degraded material while maintaining high overall productivity through rapid cyclic operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances deposition rates, reduces fiber breakage, and simplifies the printing process by using pre-cut, pre-impregnated profile rods, enabling the production of high-quality fiber-reinforced components with improved handling and material efficiency, suitable for industrial-scale applications like aircraft manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

A heating element 112 so as to heat a thermoplastic material to the melting point thereof, or beyond

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

heating duct 116 for the thermoplastic material... The heating element 112 heats a heating region 114

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

a cooling installation 122. The cooling installation cools the thermoplastic material to below the melting point of the latter such that the thermoplastic material solidifies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS11548213B2Additive manufacturing device, additive manufacturing method, and profile rod therefor
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US11548213B2 patent drawing
  • US11548213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of using solid profile rods instead of the usual filament coils for additive manufacturing methods such as 3D printing for industrial applications such as aircraft manufacturing, and to enable a more rapid production of fiber-composite components. The additive manufacturing device, or the 3D printer which generates the component layer by layer, respectively, comprises a material magazine in which a plurality of profile rods are stored. The profile rods are pre-tailored and are adapted to the component layer by layer. The profile rods, when printing, are successively retrieved from the material magazine and, by way of an infeed installation, guided to the nozzle of the additive manufacturing installation and subsequently applied to the printing bed so as to form the component layer by layer.