Progeny Selection Engine Using Prediction Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of selecting the best progenies from a large number of potential options in plant breeding programs makes it difficult to accurately determine the optimal set for advancement, especially when considering trait distribution and genetic diversity.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a prediction score based on historical phenotypic data and selection algorithms to identify and select a set of progenies for advancement in a breeding pipeline, balancing expected performance and genetic diversity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional testing methods are used to evaluate all potential progeny, then selection accuracy is improved, but time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using prediction models to assess progeny potential before actual testing. The system evaluates parent characteristics and genetic markers in advance to predict progeny performance, allowing breeders to prioritize testing only of promising candidates rather than all potential progeny, thus reducing time consumption while maintaining selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces prediction models and genetic markers as intermediary elements between parent selection and progeny testing. These intermediaries provide estimated progeny performance data that guides the selection process, enabling accurate selection without requiring comprehensive testing of all progeny, thereby reducing the time and resources needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing of all progeny is conducted, then selection reliability is improved, but the complexity of the breeding program increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection reliabilityVSAvoidbreeding program complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the breeding program into distinct phases: parent selection, prediction modeling, and targeted progeny testing. By dividing the complex process into manageable segments, the system maintains high selection reliability through structured evaluation while reducing overall program complexity through systematic organization and prioritization of testing activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of evaluation by using prediction models that incorporate genetic markers and parent characteristics instead of requiring direct phenotypic measurement of all progeny. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain reliable selection decisions while simplifying the breeding program through computational assessment rather than comprehensive physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional phenotypic selection is used, then genetic diversity is maintained, but the ability to predict future performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic diversityVSAvoidperformance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical phenotypic selection methods with computational prediction models that use genetic markers and statistical analysis. This substitution enables more accurate prediction of future performance by analyzing genetic data patterns rather than relying solely on current phenotypic expressions, thereby improving prediction accuracy while maintaining genetic diversity through objective, data-driven selection criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230386609A1Methods And Systems For Identifying Progenies For Use In Plant Breeding
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US20230386609A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386609A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386609A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary methods for identifying progenies for use in plant breeding are disclosed. One exemplary computer-implemented method includes accessing a data structure including data representative of a pool of progenies and determining a prediction score for at least a portion of the pool of progenies based on the data included in the data structure. The prediction score indicates a probability of selection of the progeny based on historical data. The method further includes selecting a group of progenies from the pool of progenies based on the prediction score, identifying a set of progenies, from the group of progenies, based on at least one of an expected performance of the group of progenies and at least one factor associated with the set of progenies, the pool of progenies and/or the group of progenies, and directing the set of progenies into a validation phase of a breeding pipeline.