Prognostic Module for Hybrid Vehicle Component Health Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems are reactive and unable to proactively test or predict the state of health of vehicle components, particularly in hybrid, fuel cell, and electric vehicles, which require advanced control strategies due to their dynamic operational ranges.

Innovation Solution

A prognostic system that uses test signals to assess the state of vehicle components by measuring responses such as voltage drop, leakage current, thermal impedance, and AC impedance, allowing for predictive maintenance and modified vehicle operation strategies based on component health.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a reactive monitoring system is used to track component operation characteristics, then the system can detect abnormal operation when it occurs, but it cannot predict or prevent component degradation before failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent state prediction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by conducting prognostic tests that actively stress components before failure occurs. Test signals are applied to components to provoke responses that reveal degradation states, allowing the system to predict future failures and take preventive action rather than merely reacting after abnormalities occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by having components test themselves through automated prognostic testing. The control unit applies test signals to components and analyzes their responses to determine health status, eliminating the need for external manual testing and enabling continuous self-diagnosis of component conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional internal combustion engine control methods are used, then the control strategy is relatively simple, but it cannot address the wide dynamic ranges and diverse usage profiles of hybrid, fuel cell, and electric vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle type adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements universality by designing a prognostic testing system that can adapt to multiple vehicle types including hybrid, fuel cell, and electric vehicles. The system uses diverse test signals that can be applied to different components across various vehicle architectures, making the control strategy universally applicable rather than vehicle-specific.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by implementing adaptive control strategies that respond to real-time component health status. The control unit dynamically adjusts vehicle operation based on prognostic test results, modifying control parameters according to the current state of power electronic modules and other components to optimize performance and prevent failure across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If no active testing is performed on vehicle components, then the system operation is uninterrupted, but the system cannot determine the actual health state or predict future failures of components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent health assessment accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by conducting prognostic tests at scheduled intervals or under specific operating conditions. The control unit applies test signals to components periodically to assess their health status without requiring continuous testing, thereby balancing measurement precision with minimal disruption to vehicle operation and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables predictive determination of component health, allowing for proactive control strategies that limit degradation and prevent permanent damage, suitable for hybrid, fuel cell, and electric vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

testing a vehicle component by using a test signal to determine a forward-on voltage drop of the tested component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage drop measurement: Ohm's Law

Implementation Method 2

testing a vehicle component by disabling at least one non-tested component and using a test signal to determine a leakage current in the tested component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeakage current measurement: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

testing a component by providing a test signal to determine thermal impedance of the component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal impedance measurement: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

testing a component by using a test signal to test for an AC impedance of the tested component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAC impedance measurement: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS7558655B2Prognostic method and system for hybrid and electric vehicle components
Publication Date: 2009.07.07 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US7558655B2 patent drawing
  • US7558655B2 patent drawing
  • US7558655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A prognostic method and system for testing and controlling various hybrid, fuel cell, and electric vehicle components. The tests generate test data for determining a state of the tested components. An operating strategy of the vehicle is controlled based on the state of its tested components.