Program Specialization via Partial Interpretation and Constant Propagation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer programs are becoming increasingly bloated due to 'feature creep,' leading to performance and security issues, with existing bloat-reduction systems often requiring manual analysis and resulting in incorrect program execution.

Innovation Solution

A computerized process that separates a program's configuration logic from its main logic, allowing for partial interpretation to establish concrete values at a 'neck' in the program, which are then propagated to simplify and remove unused instructions through optimizing transformations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If manual inspection and rewriting is used to reduce program bloat, then program size is reduced, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram sizeVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic program specialization without requiring manual analysis or rewriting by programmers. The computerized system autonomously analyzes the program, identifies unused instructions, and generates specialized versions, eliminating the need for human intervention in the bloat-reduction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical process of manual program inspection and rewriting with an automated computerized system. The system uses algorithms to analyze program semantics, track variable states, and transform programs automatically, substituting human manual labor with computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Quantity of substance

If existing computerized bloat-reduction systems are used, then program size is reduced, but program correctness deteriorates due to execution errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram sizeVSAvoidprogram correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial interpretation of the program up to a specified neck point rather than attempting to analyze or transform the entire program. This focused approach on the configuration logic portion improves correctness by avoiding complex transformations of the main logic while still achieving bloat reduction through constant propagation and instruction elimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates testing and verification mechanisms to ensure the correctness of specialized programs. By comparing the behavior of specialized programs against the original program and verifying that they produce equivalent results for the required functionality, the system maintains program correctness while reducing size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If full program interpretation is performed, then complete program analysis is achieved, but computational complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram analysis completenessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The program is divided into two distinct portions: configuration logic (above the neck) and main logic (below the neck). The system applies full interpretation and analysis only to the configuration logic portion, while the main logic is transformed using constant propagation. This segmentation reduces computational complexity while maintaining sufficient analysis precision for bloat reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial interpretation only up to the neck point rather than interpreting the entire program. This limited scope of interpretation reduces computational complexity and time requirements while still achieving effective program specialization through the subsequent constant propagation phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12079607B2Computer implemented program specialization
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US12079607B2 patent drawing
  • US12079607B2 patent drawing
  • US12079607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized technique for program simplification and specialization combines a partial interpretation of the program based on a subset of program functions to obtain variable states with concrete values at a program “neck.” These concrete values are then propagated as part of an optimization transformation that simplifies the program based on these constant values, for example, by eliminating branches that are never taken based on the constant values.