Programmable Analog Keys for Adaptive Computer Mouse Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer mice lack customizable and adaptive features to reduce user fatigue and improve control precision, as existing devices do not effectively adjust resistance forces or movement tracking sensitivity based on user input.

Innovation Solution

A computer mouse with programmable analog keys that incorporate a resistance device and force sensor to adjust resistance force profiles and movement tracking sensitivity according to user-defined settings, allowing for customizable tactile feedback and reduced user effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a computer mouse includes fixed resistance keys, then the device structure is simple, but the device lacks adaptability and cannot reduce user fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomizable resistance forceVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resistance adjustment by replacing fixed mechanical springs with controllable resistance devices (electromagnetic actuators or voice coil motors) that can vary their resistance force in real-time based on user preferences and operational context, allowing the same physical structure to adapt to different user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resistance force parameter dynamically through electronic control systems that adjust current to electromagnetic actuators, enabling continuous variation of resistance levels without mechanical reconfiguration, thus achieving adaptability while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a computer mouse includes force sensors and control circuits, then the device provides customizable resistance profiles, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogrammable force profilesVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-functional control circuit that simultaneously performs force sensing, resistance adjustment, user input processing, and communication functions, consolidating multiple control tasks into a single integrated system rather than separate dedicated circuits for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control where force sensors detect user applied force and the control circuit automatically adjusts resistance device output to maintain desired force profiles, creating a closed-loop system that reduces the need for complex open-loop control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the resistance force is increased to provide tactile feedback, then the control precision is improved, but the user effort and fatigue increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoiduser effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or pulsed resistance forces rather than continuous high resistance, providing tactile feedback only at critical moments (key press detection, threshold crossing) while maintaining low resistance during normal operation, thus achieving precision feedback without sustained user effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts resistance force levels based on operational context, providing high resistance only when tactile feedback is needed for precision control, and reducing resistance to minimal levels during normal use, optimizing the balance between feedback quality and user fatigue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced user comfort by allowing customizable resistance forces and movement tracking sensitivity, reducing user fatigue and improving control precision through programmable force profiles and adjustable threshold forces.

Implementation Method 1

the force sensor is a force sensing resister

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing resistor: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

the force sensor is a capacitive sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive sensing: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

A resistance device is coupled to the key and is configured to provide a resistance force to the key that opposes a user force applied to the top surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS9176600B2Programmable analog keys for a control device
Publication Date: 2015.11.03 LOGITECH EUROPE SA
  • US9176600B2 patent drawing
  • US9176600B2 patent drawing
  • US9176600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control devices includes a key having a top surface configured to be pressed by a user, and a resistance device coupled to the key and configured to provide a resistance force to the key that opposes a user force applied to the top surface. A force sensor is coupled to the resistance device and is configured to detect the user force applied to top surface. A control circuit is coupled to the resistance device and is configured to change the resistance force of the resistance device according to a force profile.