Programmable Atom Arrays for Coherent Combinatorial Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face challenges in maintaining coherence and quantum nonlinearity, limiting their ability to solve large-scale combinatorial optimization problems efficiently, and existing methods for encoding such problems in quantum systems are inefficient and difficult to implement.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the selective arrangement of qubits into spatial structures, such as one-, two-, or three-dimensional arrays, with ancillary qubits to encode optimization problems, using detuning patterns and light pulses to drive the system into a final state that encodes the solution, and employing quantum algorithms like QAOA to evolve the quantum state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If Rydberg excitations are used to achieve controllable interactions between atoms, then quantum simulation and quantum information processing capabilities are enabled, but coherence time is reduced and gate fidelity is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum simulation capabilityVSAvoidcoherence time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the quantum computation process into distinct segments: initialization of atoms in ground states, selective Rydberg excitation of specific atoms based on problem encoding, controlled interaction phases, and measurement. This segmentation allows the system to achieve quantum simulation capabilities through Rydberg interactions while limiting the duration of excitation to only when needed, thereby preserving overall coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic sequences of Rydberg excitations and de-excitations to implement quantum gates and simulations. By using time-periodic control fields to drive the system through sequences of excited and ground states, the method enables quantum information processing while returning atoms to coherent ground states between operations, thus maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of qubits are arranged into spatial structures to encode optimization problems, then the range of solvable problems is expanded, but the complexity of controlling and initializing each qubit increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem encoding capabilityVSAvoidqubit control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal atom trapping and manipulation platform that can encode different optimization problems by simply reconfiguring the spatial arrangement of atoms and adjusting interaction parameters. The same experimental apparatus and control sequences can solve various problems (maximum independent set, maximum clique, etc.) by changing the problem-specific encoding in the atomic configuration, rather than requiring problem-specific hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses optical fields and Rydberg states as intermediaries to control interactions between atoms. Instead of directly controlling each qubit pair, the patent employs global and local light fields to mediate interactions, enabling scalable control of large atom arrays through a small number of control parameters that affect multiple atoms simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If existing quantum computing systems are used to solve combinatorial optimization problems, then quantum effects are utilized, but the systems lack sufficient coherence and quantum nonlinearity for efficient large-scale problem solving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum coherenceVSAvoidproblem solving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes key parameters including the number of Rydberg-excited atoms, the duration of excitation pulses, and the spatial configuration of atoms to optimize both coherence maintenance and problem-solving efficiency. By adjusting these parameters based on the specific problem being solved, the system achieves efficient quantum simulation while maintaining sufficient coherence times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient encoding and solving a broader range of combinatorial optimization problems, including maximum independent set and maximum clique problems, with improved performance compared to classical algorithms, by reducing long-range interactions and utilizing coherent quantum dynamics.

Implementation Method 1

These bottom-up approaches are complementary to the methods involving optical lattices loaded with ultracold atoms prepared via evaporative cooling, and generally result in atom separations of several micrometers. Controllable interactions between the atoms can be introduced to utilize these arrays for quantum simulation and quantum information processing. This can be achieved by coherent coupling to highly excited Rydberg states, which exhibit strong, long-range interactions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRydberg interaction: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

driving the plurality of qubits into a final state by applying a sequence of resonant light pulses with a variable duration and a variable optical phase to at least some of the plurality of qubits

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonant excitation: Resonance

Implementation Method 3

Coherent coupling to highly excited Rydberg states, which exhibit strong, long-range interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRydberg state coupling:

Data Source

PatentUS20250378361A1Quantum computing for combinatorial optimization problems using programmable atom arrays
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US20250378361A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378361A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378361A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods relate to selectively arranging a plurality of qubits into a spatial structure to encode a quantum computing problem. Exemplary arrangement techniques can be applied to encode various quantum computing problems. The plurality of qubits can be driven according to various driving techniques into a final state. The final state can be measured to identify an exact or approximate solution to the quantum computing problem.