Programmable Feed Forward Equalizer Using Capacitive Unit Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current feed forward equalizer (FFE) implementations in integrated circuits are inefficient in terms of power consumption and die area, particularly when designing receivers that operate using both PAM2 and PAM4 modalities, and they do not provide the same signal-to-noise ratio improvement as decision feedback equalizers while being prone to burst error propagation.

Innovation Solution

A programmable feed forward equalizer is implemented using a plurality of unit cells with capacitive elements and clock logic to control switches, allowing for adjustable capacitance and filter coefficients, which are applied as a selected voltage signal to improve signal processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a trans-conductance (gm) stage is used to implement FFE, then the equalization function is achieved, but power consumption and die area increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization functionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional trans-conductance (gm) stage with a voltage-mode implementation using capacitive elements and switches. This substitution eliminates the need for high-power gm stages while achieving the same equalization function through voltage sampling and weighting, directly reducing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the implementation parameter from current-mode (gm stage) to voltage-mode (capacitive sampling). By using capacitors to store voltage samples and switches to control their contribution to the summing node, the system achieves equivalent equalization with significantly lower power dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a trans-conductance (gm) stage is used to implement FFE, then the equalization function is achieved, but die area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization functionVSAvoiddie area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the large-area trans-conductance (gm) stage with compact voltage-mode circuitry consisting of small capacitive elements and switches. This substitution dramatically reduces the occupied die area while maintaining the equalization function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple identical unit cells, each containing capacitive elements and switches, that can be replicated and pipelined. This modular approach allows efficient use of die area through standardization and reuse of the same circuit blocks across multiple stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If decision feedback equalization is used, then signal-to-noise ratio is improved, but burst error propagation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidburst error propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the equalization function into multiple independent unit cells with capacitive elements, each processing signal samples independently. This segmentation avoids the feedback mechanism that causes error propagation while maintaining SNR improvement through parallel processing of signal components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the feedback path from the equalization system, replacing it with a feedforward architecture using capacitive sampling. This extraction eliminates the mechanism that causes burst error propagation while preserving the beneficial SNR improvement through selective signal weighting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If pipelined architecture is implemented, then data rate is increased, but circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the equalization function into multiple identical unit cells that can be pipelined. Each unit cell is a simple, standardized block containing capacitive elements and switches, making the overall complex high-data-rate system composed of many simple, manageable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic clock logic to control the timing of switches and capacitive elements in each pipeline stage. This dynamic control enables high data rates by coordinating the operation of multiple pipeline stages, with each stage processing data at the appropriate clock phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9385898B2Pipelined programmable feed forward equalizer (FFE) for a receiver
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9385898B2 patent drawing
  • US9385898B2 patent drawing
  • US9385898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A programmable feed forward equalizer (FFE) includes a plurality of unit cells, each unit cell comprising a capacitive element coupled to an input connection by a first switch and coupled to an output connection by a second switch. The FFE also comprises clock logic configured to control the first switch and the second switch so that a selected voltage signal is applied to the capacitive element at a selected time such that the selected voltage signal defines a capacitance of the capacitive element, the clock logic causing the second switch to couple the capacitive element to the output connection so as to apply the selected voltage signal as a filter coefficient to a summing element.