Programmable Universal Logic Gate for IC Camouflage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for protecting integrated circuits against reverse engineering are either too expensive for mass production or incur significant area, energy, and delay penalties, and there is a need for effective techniques to prevent IC piracy and design theft.

Innovation Solution

A programmable logic circuit that implements a universal gate using a combination of MULTI-AND-NOR and AND-ORAND-NOR gates, controlled by program bits, which can realize various basic Boolean functions, thereby providing circuit camouflage and enhancing security against reverse engineering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional reverse engineering protection methods are used, then circuit security is improved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit securityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal gate that can perform multiple Boolean functions (AND, OR, NAND, NOR, XOR, XNOR, NOT, BUFFER) by configuring control bits, replacing the need for multiple separate gates. This multi-functional approach reduces circuit area and complexity while maintaining security against reverse engineering, providing a cost-effective solution that does not require expensive specialized protection circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamically reconfigurable logic where the gate functionality changes based on control bit values. The circuit can switch between different Boolean functions at runtime, making reverse engineering difficult because the circuit behavior is not fixed. This dynamic reconfiguration capability provides strong security protection while using standard, cost-effective manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If circuit camouflage techniques are used, then reverse engineering resistance is improved, but area overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse engineering resistanceVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing a single universal gate that can emulate eight different basic gates through control bit configuration, the patent achieves circuit camouflage without significant area overhead. The same physical hardware structure provides multiple logical functions, reducing the total area required compared to implementing separate camouflage circuits for each gate type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple gate functions into a single reconfigurable logic unit. Instead of having separate physical structures for AND, OR, NAND, NOR, XOR, XNOR, NOT, and BUFFER gates, all these functions are combined into one universal gate structure that can be programmed to perform any of them, significantly reducing area overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate gates are used to implement Boolean functions, then functional versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal gate that can perform eight different Boolean functions (AND, OR, NAND, NOR, XOR, XNOR, NOT, BUFFER) by configuring four control bits, replacing the need for multiple separate gates. This multi-functional approach reduces circuit area and complexity while maintaining security against reverse engineering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed logic circuits are used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different functions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfunctional adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamically reconfigurable logic where the gate functionality changes based on control bit values. The circuit can switch between different Boolean functions at runtime, making reverse engineering difficult because the circuit behavior is not fixed. This dynamic reconfiguration capability provides strong security protection while using standard, cost-effective manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10418999B2Programmable logic circuit and method for implementing a boolean function
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10418999B2 patent drawing
  • US10418999B2 patent drawing
  • US10418999B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, a programmable logic circuit is described comprising a first data bit input to receive a first data bit a and a second data bit input to receive a second data bit b, a first program bit input to receive a first program bit p1, a second program bit input to receive a second program bit p2, a third program bit input to receive a third program bit p3 and a fourth program bit to receive a fourth program bit p4 and an output configured to output(((a⋀b)⋁(p1⋀a)⋁(p2⋀b))_⋀(p3⋁b⋁a))⋁(a⋀b⋀p4)_.