Programmable Medication Reminder Device with Adaptive Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for reminding patients to take medication are limited in customization, usability, and adaptability, particularly failing to handle irregular lifestyles and travel to different time zones, and lack features to adjust dosing schedules based on actual intake times.

Innovation Solution

A programmable device with a real-time clock, programmable memory, and a simple interface that allows for customizable alert schedules, adaptable to different time zones, and capable of adjusting future alert times based on actual intake times, featuring visual and audible signals, and suitable for various user needs, including the elderly and those with disabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a programmable device with multiple features is designed to handle complex medication schedules, then the functionality and adaptability are improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different medication schedulesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed as a universal programmable reminder system that can handle multiple medication schedules, travel scenarios, and dosing patterns through a single configurable interface. The real-time clock and programmable memory enable the same hardware to adapt to various medication regimens without requiring multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses programmable parameters stored in memory to define alert times, intervals, and dosing schedules. By changing these software parameters rather than hardware configuration, the device achieves high adaptability while maintaining simple physical architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If an external computer interface is used for programming the device, then the programming flexibility is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The external computer serves as an intermediary device that simplifies the programming process. The computer handles complex schedule calculations and provides a user-friendly interface, while the portable device simply receives and executes the programmed instructions, dividing the complexity between two devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into two functional parts: a programming station (computer) for creating and calculating complex schedules, and an execution device (portable reminder) for providing alerts and tracking compliance. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the device calculates intake times based on only three factors, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to irregular lifestyles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation simplicityVSAvoidsupport for irregular lifestyles
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device dynamically adjusts medication schedules based on actual user feedback. When a user takes medication at a different time than scheduled, the device recalculates subsequent doses to maintain proper intervals, adapting to irregular lifestyles while keeping the calculation logic straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates feedback mechanisms where user actions (taking medication early or late) are detected and used to automatically adjust future alert times. This feedback loop enables the simple device to handle complex, irregular scheduling needs by continuously adapting to actual user behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If the device provides detailed textual information, then the information completeness is improved, but the ease of operation for illiterate users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidusability for illiterate users
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses color-coded visual indicators (such as colored LEDs or display elements) to convey medication status and timing information. Different colors represent different states (e.g., green for on-time, yellow for late, red for missed), providing intuitive information without requiring text literacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses periodic visual or audible signals (flashing lights, beeping sounds) to alert users about upcoming medication times and status. These rhythmic patterns provide clear, language-independent communication that is easily perceived by all users regardless of literacy level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8326574B2Programmable device for issuing alert signals as a reminder to perform a recurring act
Publication Date: 2012.12.04 INIVENTION
  • US8326574B2 patent drawing
  • US8326574B2 patent drawing
  • US8326574B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for issuing alert signals as a reminder to perform a recurring act. The method comprises providing a device with a programmable electronic circuit, an electrical power source, a control switch, and an alert body controlled by the electronic circuit, programming the device with a signaling pattern, determining a first alert time based at least in part on the signaling pattern, issuing a first signal from the alert body, issuing a second signal from the alert body at the first alert time, the second signal being different from the first signal, and determining a next alert time upon activation of the control switch, wherein the next alert time is based at least in part on the signaling pattern and the time elapsed between the first alert time and activation of the control switch.