Programmable Railcar Tank Cleaning System with Telescopic Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for cleaning railcar tanks are inefficient and hazardous, with handheld nozzles being slow and labor-intensive, and remotely controlled systems facing visibility issues and resource wastage due to non-targeted cleaning patterns.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulically controlled programmable railcar tank cleaning system with telescoping robotic arms and dual opposing booms that utilize fluid jets to break up and liquefy waste, allowing for simultaneous cleaning from both ends and precise waste collection at the drain outlet, equipped with hydraulic actuators and a control panel for real-time operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If handheld water nozzles are used for cleaning railcar tanks, then cleaning can be performed manually, but the process becomes slow, tedious, and labor-intensive with safety hazards to operators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation capabilityVSAvoidcleaning speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation where the robotic cleaning system autonomously performs tank cleaning without requiring continuous manual intervention. The programmable controller automatically sequences the cleaning operations, positioning the nozzle assembly and controlling fluid jet application throughout the tank interior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical nozzle handling with an automated robotic system that uses fluid jets for cleaning. The mechanical system includes a robotic arm or movable platform carrying the nozzle assembly, which is positioned and controlled automatically rather than by hand-held operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If remotely controlled systems are used for cleaning, then operator safety is improved, but visibility is limited making it difficult to survey the area and determine appropriate cleaning patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator exposure to hazardous fluidsVSAvoidvisibility for surveying cleaning area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs lighting systems that illuminate the tank interior, and the camera system captures visual information that is displayed to the operator. The lighting and visual display systems enable the operator to see the cleaning area and waste accumulation patterns despite the confined and potentially dark environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a camera system as an intermediary between the cleaning system and the operator. The camera captures images and video of the tank interior, transmitting this visual information to the operator who can then survey the area and determine appropriate cleaning patterns without directly entering the hazardous environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If rotating or self-propelled nozzles are used, then automated cleaning is achieved, but resources are wasted cleaning areas that do not need cleaning and cycle times are extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated cleaning operationVSAvoidwater and electricity consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors and detection mechanisms that monitor the cleaning progress and waste accumulation patterns. This feedback information is used by the programmable controller to adjust the cleaning pattern in real-time, directing fluid jets only to areas where waste is present and adjusting the speed and coverage area of the nozzle assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies cleaning resources locally and selectively rather than uniformly throughout the tank. The system identifies specific areas with waste accumulation and concentrates the fluid jet application in those zones, rather than cleaning the entire tank surface equally. This localized approach reduces water and energy consumption while maintaining effective cleaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If comprehensive 360-degree cleaning is performed, then all areas are cleaned, but resource consumption increases and cycle time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethoroughness of cleaning coverageVSAvoidcleaning cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial cleaning actions by focusing fluid jet application only on areas where waste is detected, rather than applying cleaning uniformly across the entire tank. The programmable controller adjusts the nozzle positioning and fluid flow to concentrate effort on problem areas, reducing overall cycle time while maintaining adequate cleaning coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning system dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time conditions. The robotic arm or movable platform speed, nozzle positioning, and fluid flow rate are continuously modified during operation to match the actual waste distribution and cleaning requirements of different tank zones, optimizing both thoroughness and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces cycle times, enhances safety by minimizing exposure to hazardous conditions, and optimizes resource usage through targeted cleaning and efficient waste collection, while operating in challenging environments with hazardous vapors and dusts.

Implementation Method 1

nozzles which utilize fluid jets to break up, liquefy, and motivate tank material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid jet: Jet

Implementation Method 2

a movable platform or a robotic arm with a hydraulic actuator that moves a nozzle assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuator: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP3810333B1Programmable railcar tank cleaning system
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 INNES ALEX G
  • EP3810333B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3810333B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3810333B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods for passing railcar tank cleaning systems through the opening and mounted to existing manways. The invention can extend horizontally more than 25 feet and clean rail cars up to and beyond approximately 102 inches in diameter for manual, automated, or semi-automated programmable railcar tank cleaning systems, devices and methods for providing safe and efficient methods for breaking up oil, tar, chemical, radioactive, hazardous, or any other liquid, solid, or sludge waste inside rail tank cars and the like with nozzles which utilize fluid jets to break up, liquefy, and motivate tank material. The programmable railcar cleaning system can be a standalone, independent unit or integrated into new designs and/or existing systems. Simplified programming and user interface allow an operator to remotely operate the system. The various capabilities of this Invention allow cleaning in a quicker and more efficient manner. The system is hydraulically controlled and can work in the presence of flammable vapors and dust.