Programmable RFID Ignition Key for Agricultural Vehicle Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural vehicles face security vulnerabilities due to the use of a common ignition key across multiple tractors, making them susceptible to theft, as existing security systems that utilize unique key codes are inconvenient for allowing shared access among farm employees.

Innovation Solution

A programmable security system that allows farmers to set the same security codes across multiple vehicles using an RFID module and electronic module, enabling the same key to operate all vehicles on a farm while preventing unauthorized use on other farms, with optional features like display modules and backup codes for emergency access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a common mechanical ignition key is used across all agricultural vehicles, then ease of operation is improved (employees can use the same key to operate any tractor), but security is worsened (vehicles become susceptible to theft)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey sharing among employeesVSAvoidvehicle security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ignition key is segmented into two functional parts: a mechanical element for physical lock engagement and an electronic RFID chip for authentication. This segmentation allows the mechanical part to remain universal for ease of use while the electronic part provides unique identification and security credentials for each vehicle-owner pair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An electronic control unit acts as an intermediary between the mechanical ignition lock and the engine starting system. This intermediary verifies the RFID code match between key and vehicle before permitting engine operation, thereby enforcing security without preventing legitimate key sharing among authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If unique factory-set key codes are implemented for each vehicle, then security is improved (each key becomes unique to a vehicle), but ease of operation is worsened (farmers cannot use the same key on multiple vehicles)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey uniqueness and securityVSAvoidmulti-vehicle key usability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static factory-set unique codes to dynamic programmable codes that can be changed by the vehicle owner. This allows the same physical key to be programmed with identical authentication codes for multiple vehicles owned by the same farmer, while maintaining unique security credentials that prevent unauthorized use by other farms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication code parameter stored in the RFID chip and electronic control unit can be modified by the owner through a programming interface. This parameter change capability enables the key to be adapted for use across multiple vehicles while maintaining security, as the codes are programmable rather than fixed at manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If programmable security codes are implemented, then adaptability is improved (same key can be used on multiple vehicles), but device complexity is worsened (programming interface and RFID module required)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey programming flexibilityVSAvoidelectronic module and programming interface
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RFID reader/writer interface is designed to be universal and can serve multiple functions: initial key programming, code changes, and system diagnostics. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated programming equipment, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the electronic module completely disables vehicle operation on code mismatch, then security is improved (theft prevention), but ease of operation is worsened (no functionality for unauthorized keys)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidvehicle functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of complete disablement, the system applies partial action by limiting engine power output when authentication fails. The engine can still operate but with severely restricted power delivery, which prevents theft while allowing the vehicle to be moved under its own power for legitimate purposes such as recovery or demonstration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security by allowing shared key usage within a farm while preventing cross-farm access, offering customizable security settings and reduced functionality options in case of code mismatch, thereby reducing tractor theft risks while maintaining backward compatibility with existing systems.

Implementation Method 1

The memory chip is preferably part of an RFID (radio frequency identification) module that communicates by radio with the electronic module.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency identification (RFID): Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Power may be supplied to the chip through electrical contacts but it is preferred to use an inductive loop.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2383155B1Security system of an agricultural vehicle.
Publication Date: 2014.06.11 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP2383155B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system is disclosed for an agricultural vehicle which comprises an ignition lock and an ignition key (10) for releasing the ignition lock. The key incorporates a machine-readable memory chip (12) for storing a security code, and an electronic module (20) is mounted in the vehicle for reading the code stored in the key (10) and disabling normal operation of the vehicle when the code stored in the key (10) does not match a code stored on board the vehicle. In the invention, the electronic module (20) is additionally capable of writing to the memory chip (12) incorporated the key (10), so as to enable an authorised vehicle operator to change both the code stored in the key and the code stored on board the vehicle.