Programmable Steam Trap Reduces Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steam trap apparatuses lack flexibility and controllability, leading to inefficiencies, steam loss, and increased maintenance costs due to their mechanical operation and inability to adapt to varying operating conditions such as pressure and load.

Innovation Solution

A Programmable Steam Trap apparatus with electronically controlled actuated valves and sensors that compare temperature and pressure readings to the steam saturation curve, allowing for real-time adjustment to prevent steam loss and efficiently remove condensate and non-condensable gases, featuring a control system that can input time delays and accommodate varying steam system pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional mechanical steam traps are used, then the apparatus is simple in structure, but it lacks flexibility and controllability leading to steam loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and controllabilityVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical steam trap operation with an electronically controlled system. Sensors detect temperature and pressure conditions, and an electronic controller actuates the valve based on these readings compared against saturation curve data, eliminating the need for mechanical float or bimetallic mechanisms and enabling programmable control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates saturation curve data that defines relationships between temperature, pressure, and steam quality. The controller programmatically adjusts valve actuation timing based on real-time sensor readings compared to saturation conditions, allowing dynamic adaptation to varying operating parameters such as pressure and load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If conventional steam traps operate mechanically, then the device is simple to operate, but it causes steam loss and inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam lossVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors temperature and pressure conditions through sensors and uses this feedback to control valve actuation. The controller compares real-time sensor readings against saturation curve data and adjusts the actuated valve accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents steam loss by opening the valve only when condensate or non-condensable gases are actually present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates time delay parameters that allow anticipatory control. The controller can be programmed to open the valve before saturation conditions are fully reached, preventing condensate accumulation that would otherwise cause steam loss. This preliminary action is based on programmable time delays and saturation curve predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional steam traps are used, then maintenance costs are reduced in terms of device simplicity, but actual maintenance costs increase due to inefficiency and steam loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment through its sensor array and programmable controller. The controller continuously monitors saturation conditions and automatically adjusts valve actuation timing, eliminating the need for manual intervention or complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms. The system serves itself by comparing sensor readings against embedded saturation curve data and making real-time control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The Programmable Steam Trap apparatus enhances efficiency, flexibility, and controllability, reducing steam loss and maintenance costs by accurately replicating the steam saturation curve, allowing for real-time data collection and optimized sterilization processes, thereby minimizing energy and water usage.

Implementation Method 1

a first temperature sensor, a second temperature sensor, a pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement:

Implementation Method 2

a pressure sensor positioned upstream from the actuated valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Implementation Method 3

determines whether to open the actuated valve to release condensate, air or non-condensable gas from the steam space based on temperature reading from the temperature sensors and the pressure reading from the pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change detection: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP2414722B1Programmable steam trap apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.10.21 TEVA PHARMA IND LTD
  • EP2414722B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2414722B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2414722B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus and a method for removing condensate and unwanted gas from vapor/liquid systems while preventing steam loss are provided. The steam trap apparatus replaces the automatic valve type steam trap with an efficient, controllable, and programmable steam trap. In addition, the improved steam trap apparatus allows for real-time data collection during sterilization and other operations.