External Programmer Group Management for Stimulation Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Patients with implantable medical devices delivering electrical stimulation therapy face challenges in managing multiple stimulation programs, including difficulty in remembering effective programs, navigating through numerous options, and efficiently evaluating program groups, which strains clinic resources and patient time.

Innovation Solution

An external programmer with a user interface that distinguishes between evaluated and unevaluated program groups, allowing patients to hide ineffective groups, mark effective ones, and sort lists to highlight unevaluated or effective groups, thereby simplifying the evaluation process and reducing the number of programs to navigate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If patients evaluate all stimulation program options at the clinic, then comprehensive therapy evaluation is achieved, but clinic time and resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy evaluation completenessVSAvoidclinic time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the program evaluation process into two phases: initial clinic-based evaluation of program groups by the clinician, and subsequent patient-based evaluation at home using an external programmer. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation to occur across multiple settings and time periods, reducing the time burden on clinic resources while maintaining evaluation completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clinician performs preliminary evaluation and organization of program groups before the patient receives the devices. Program groups are pre-configured and prepared in advance, allowing the patient to later evaluate only specific groups rather than all individual programs, thereby reducing the overall evaluation time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If patients browse through dozens of programs to evaluate therapy options, then thorough program assessment is achieved, but the evaluation process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram assessment thoroughnessVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Programs are organized into logical groups that can be evaluated as units rather than individual programs. The patient can evaluate entire groups at once using the external programmer, which reduces the number of evaluation steps from dozens of individual programs to a manageable number of groups, while still achieving thorough assessment of all therapy options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of evaluation by allowing patients to assess program groups in the comfort of their own homes using portable external programmers, rather than being confined to clinic-based evaluation. This dimensional shift in evaluation context enables more flexible and efficient program assessment without compromising thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If all program groups are presented to the patient without distinction, then complete program options are available, but navigation becomes complex and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram option availabilityVSAvoidprogram navigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The external programmer uses visual indicators (such as different colors or icons) to distinguish between evaluated and unevaluated program groups. This visual coding system allows patients to quickly identify which groups have been assessed and which remain, simplifying navigation through the program options while maintaining access to all available programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The programmer interface segments the display into distinct categories of program groups (evaluated vs. unevaluated), making the overall program selection process more manageable. This segmentation helps patients navigate through dozens of programs by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable subsets with clear visual differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9067076B2Management of multiple stimulation program groups
Publication Date: 2015.06.30 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US9067076B2 patent drawing
  • US9067076B2 patent drawing
  • US9067076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes a method and system that allows a user to manage multiple groups of stimulation programs that provide stimulation therapy. A physician may prepare a plurality of programs, arranged in groups that each focus on one area, that the patient may evaluate in an effort to determine if any programs provide efficacious therapy. Since the patient may be evaluating many groups by using a patient programmer, managing the groups may be difficult. The patient programmer may enable the patient to hide ineffective groups to minimize the number of groups available for therapy. In addition, the programmer may allow the patient to mark each group or program as effective or ineffective, to more easily manage groups and programs during stimulation therapy. In addition, the patient may unhide a group or program if the patient desires to reevaluate a formerly hidden option.