Progressive Center of Gravity Golf Iron Set Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sets of golf irons lack a progressive center of gravity distribution, leading to inconsistent ball flight trajectories and distances, as the center of gravity position remains constant across different loft angles, affecting the launch angle and distance of the golf ball.

Innovation Solution

A set of golf clubs with long, mid, and short irons featuring a progressive center of gravity allocation, where the center of gravity is positioned differently across each type, with long irons having a center of gravity between 0 mm and 2.5 mm from the face center, mid-irons between 0 mm and 2.5 mm, and short irons between 3 mm and 4 mm, along with strategically placed weight members to optimize moment of inertia and loft angle-specific designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the center of gravity position is kept constant across all irons in a set, then manufacturing is simpler and design is more consistent, but ball flight trajectories become inconsistent and distance control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity position consistencyVSAvoidball flight consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning the center of gravity at different locations for different iron types within the same set. Long irons (15-25 degrees loft) have the center of gravity positioned 0-2.5mm from the face center, while short irons (37-47 degrees loft) have it positioned 3-4mm from the face center. This localized differentiation optimizes ball flight characteristics for each club type while maintaining overall set performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by systematically varying the center of gravity position parameter across the iron set based on loft angle. As loft angle increases from long to short irons, the horizontal distance of the center of gravity from the face center increases progressively. This parameter progression ensures consistent ball flight trajectories and improved distance control throughout the set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the center of gravity is positioned closer to the face center for all irons, then launch angle control is improved, but moment of inertia decreases and shot stability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaunch angle controlVSAvoidshot stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing the center of gravity position for each iron type's specific performance requirements. Long irons use a center of gravity position of 0-2.5mm from the face center to achieve lower launch angles, while short irons use 3-4mm to maintain stability during higher lofted shots. Each location is locally optimized for its specific club type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by creating a progressive system where the center of gravity position dynamically adapts to different loft angles. The horizontal distance from the face center increases as loft angle increases, creating a dynamic relationship between club geometry and mass distribution that optimizes performance across the entire set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If weight members are added to adjust center of gravity position, then ball flight consistency is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball flight consistencyVSAvoidclub head structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically placing weight members in specific regions of the club head to achieve the desired center of gravity position for each iron type. Weight members are positioned in the hosel or sole regions, spaced at least 75% of the blade length from each other, with weight center of gravities below the iron's center of gravity. This localized weighting achieves performance goals without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9750994B2Progressive iron set
Publication Date: 2017.09.05 ACUSHNET CO
  • US9750994B2 patent drawing
  • US9750994B2 patent drawing
  • US9750994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is direct to a set of golf clubs comprising long irons, mid-irons and short irons. The long irons have a first center of gravity positioned horizontally from the face center toward the hosel by a first distance. The mid-irons have a second center of gravity positioned horizontally from the face center toward the hosel by a second distance. The short irons have a third center of gravity positioned horizontally from the face center toward the hosel by a third distance that is greater than the first and second distances.