Progressive Ophthalmic Lens Optimization via Directional Derivative Minimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current progressive ophthalmic lens designs fail to effectively minimize undesired astigmatism distribution, particularly due to the lack of consideration for the directional derivative of astigmatism and power gradients, leading to suboptimal vision correction for users with prescription astigmatism.
Innovation Solution
The method optimizes progressive lens design by incorporating terms related to the directional derivatives of astigmatism and power gradients into the minimization function, allowing for asymmetric distributions and weighting based on the angle and prescription cylinder, thereby minimizing astigmatism gradients in specific directions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If conventional progressive lens designs are used, then the lens provides basic vision correction, but undesired astigmatism distribution is not effectively minimized
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the optimization function to include directional derivatives of astigmatism and power gradients. This involves changing the mathematical parameters from simple power distribution to incorporating directional components (first and second directional derivatives) that account for astigmatism orientation and magnitude in different regions of the lens, thereby achieving better astigmatism control.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces another dimension by adding directional derivative components to the optimization function. Instead of only considering scalar power values, the solution incorporates vector-like directional information (gradients in x and y directions), effectively moving from a one-dimensional power optimization to a multi-dimensional optimization that includes spatial orientation of astigmatism.
2Manufacturing precision
If asymmetric distributions and weighting based on angle and prescription cylinder are incorporated, then astigmatism gradients are minimized in specific directions, but the design complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by implementing asymmetric weight distributions in the optimization function. Different regions of the lens (near zone, distance zone, intermediate zone) receive different weighting factors based on their specific optical requirements and astigmatism characteristics. This allows tailored optimization for each zone rather than applying a uniform approach across the entire lens surface.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes parameters by introducing angle-dependent weighting and prescription cylinder-based adjustments to the optimization function. The weights w1i, w2i, w3i are modified to account for local astigmatism orientation and magnitude, creating a more complex but region-specific optimization approach that adapts to local optical conditions.
3Ease of operation
If the minimization function includes directional derivatives of astigmatism and power gradients, then vision correction is improved, but the computational complexity of the optimization process increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing the directional derivatives of astigmatism and power gradients during the lens design phase. These pre-computed values are then used in the optimization function, avoiding the need for complex real-time calculations during manufacturing or fitting. The directional information is prepared in advance to facilitate smoother optimization.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary optimization function that acts as a mediator between the complex optical parameters and the final lens design. This function F incorporates multiple terms (power errors, astigmatism, directional derivatives) with adjustable weights, serving as an intermediate computational layer that simplifies the overall optimization process by breaking it down into manageable components.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for optimising a progressive ophthalmic lens and to a method for producing same. Further disclosed it a method for optimising a progressive ophthalmic lens the distribution of power and undesired astigmatism along an optical surface is optimised by minimising the function:F·=·∑i=1nw1i(Asti)2+w2i(Powi-TargetPow)2wherein w1i and w2i are 0 or positive, and wherein the subscript i indicates the different points of the optical surface. Summation additionally comprises a term from the group formed byw4mi·(∂Asti∂x)m,w5mi·(∂Asti∂y)m,w6mi·(∂Powi∂x)m,w7mi·(∂Powi∂y)mand multiplications thereof,m being greater than or equal to 1,and w4mi, w5mi, w6mi and w7mi being greater than or equal to 0,wherein if any of the terms of the group formed by(∂Asti∂x)m,(∂Asti∂y)m,(∂Powi∂x)m,(∂Powi∂y)mand multiplications thereof is less than 0, then same is substituted by the absolute value thereof, and wherein, if m=2 and w42i=w52i, neither being 0, then summation additionally includes at least one other term from the group.


