Progressive Lens Simulator with AI-Guided Design Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for prescribing progressive lenses lack patient-centric, modern optoelectronic technologies, leading to inadequate simulation of progressive lens experiences before purchase, incomplete data collection, and inefficient lens design optimization, resulting in high return rates and suboptimal patient satisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A Progressive Lens Simulator system utilizing an Eye Tracker, Off-Axis Progressive Lens Simulator, and Axial Power-Distance Simulator to create comprehensive simulations, allowing patients to interactively explore and provide feedback on progressive lens designs, leveraging modern optoelectronic technologies and artificial intelligence for personalized lens design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional analog optometric devices are used to prescribe progressive lenses, then the prescription process is simple and quick, but patients cannot experience the progressive lens effects before purchase leading to high return rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient satisfactionVSAvoidreturn visits for adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of progressive lens effects before the actual lens is manufactured. Patients use the simulator to experience different lens designs, corridor lengths, and power distributions in advance, allowing them to make informed decisions and reducing the need for return visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the progressive lens experience through digital simulation. The progressive lens simulator reproduces the optical effects, distortion patterns, and visual experiences of actual progressive lenses, allowing patients to test-drive lens designs without physical trial frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If only two distances (near and distance) are tested during prescription, then the examination process is quick, but it does not account for patients' unique usage patterns at multiple distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-distance optimizationVSAvoidexamination procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static two-distance testing to dynamic multi-distance simulation. Patients can interactively adjust gaze distances and explore visual experiences at intermediate distances (computer work, dashboard viewing, etc.), allowing the examination to adapt to individual usage patterns while maintaining efficiency through automated guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If progressive lens design optimization uses only 2-3 patient parameters, then the prescription process is efficient, but the lens design is under-defined and cannot achieve true optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens design optimizationVSAvoidpatient visual needs data
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where patient responses to simulated lens designs inform subsequent design adjustments. The progressive lens simulator captures detailed feedback on visual comfort, distortion perception, and preference across multiple distances, which feeds back into the optimization algorithm to refine lens parameters beyond the traditional 2-3 measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If modern optoelectronic technologies and AI are integrated into the prescription system, then lens design optimization and patient experience improve, but the system complexity and initial treatment time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens design exploration efficiencyVSAvoidsimulation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The progressive lens simulator is designed to guide patients through self-directed exploration of lens designs. The system automatically presents different lens options, captures patient feedback, and adjusts simulations without requiring extensive optometrist intervention, allowing the complex technology to serve itself while reducing ongoing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11202563B2Guided lens design exploration system for a progressive lens simulator
Publication Date: 2021.12.21 NEWTON INC
  • US11202563B2 patent drawing
  • US11202563B2 patent drawing
  • US11202563B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Progressive Lens Simulator comprises an Eye Tracker, for tracking an eye axis direction to determine a gaze distance, an Off-Axis Progressive Lens Simulator, for generating an Off-Axis progressive lens simulation; and an Axial Power-Distance Simulator, for simulating a progressive lens power in the eye axis direction. The Progressive Lens Simulator can alternatively include an Integrated Progressive Lens Simulator, for creating a Comprehensive Progressive Lens Simulation. The Progressive Lens Simulator can be Head-mounted. A Guided Lens Design Exploration System for the Progressive Lens Simulator can include a Progressive Lens Simulator, a Feedback-Control Interface, and a Progressive Lens Design processor, to generate a modified progressive lens simulation for the patient after a guided modification of the progressive lens design. A Deep Learning Method for an Artificial Intelligence Engine can be used for a Progressive Lens Design Processor.