Progressive Prize Allocation for Gaming Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gaming systems face challenges in providing progressive or jackpot prizes that offer varying expected returns to players based on different wager options, leading to unequal contributions and player dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where multiple progressive or jackpot prizes are maintained, each associated with distinct wager options, with contributions to these prizes based on the probability of occurrence and value of wagers, ensuring that each wager option provides a different probability of winning and reducing the difference in expected return to player across options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single progressive prize is offered for all wager options, then the gaming system is simple to operate, but the expected return to player varies significantly across different wager options, causing player dissatisfaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of progressive prize operationVSAvoidfairness of expected return to player
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single progressive prize into multiple separate progressive prizes, each associated with a specific wager option. This segmentation ensures that each wager option has its own dedicated progressive prize pool, creating a direct relationship between the wager amount and the progressive prize eligibility, thereby ensuring fairness in expected return across different wager options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the progressive prize winning event is based on a fixed symbol combination, then the game rules are simple and easy to understand, but the contribution to expected return is higher for single credit wagers than multiple credit wagers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of game rulesVSAvoidequality of expected return contribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the progressive prize contribution rate dependent on the specific wager option selected. Different wager options have different contribution rates to their associated progressive prizes, with higher wager options typically having higher contribution rates. This ensures that the expected return contribution is proportional and fair across all wager options while maintaining simple fixed symbol combination winning events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10777042B2Apparatus, system and method for awarding progressive or jackpot prizes
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 ARISTOCRAT TECH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
  • US10777042B2 patent drawing
  • US10777042B2 patent drawing
  • US10777042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Gaming methods and apparatus are described for providing a plurality of progressive prizes for a gaming system. Separate progressive prizes are maintained for each of a plurality of different wager options for a game playable on the gaming system. The progressive prizes can be maintained so as to reduce the difference in contribution to the expected return to player between the wager options.