Progressive Wagering Game Playback Gated by Wager Requirements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gaming devices lack interactive features that enhance spectator involvement and excitement during live sporting events, particularly in managing viewer engagement and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

Implement a gaming device system that provides live sporting event video and allows users to place wagers, with a mechanism to suspend or resume video playback based on wagering activity, ensuring continuous engagement and revenue generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If live sporting event video is provided continuously to gaming devices, then user engagement and spectator involvement are enhanced, but revenue generation and operational efficiency deteriorate due to lack of wagering requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidrevenue generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts video playback state based on wagering activity. Video playback transitions between playing and suspended states according to whether wagering requirements are met, creating a dynamic interaction between user engagement and revenue generation that resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where video playback status is monitored and adjusted based on wagering outcomes. Alert messages provide feedback to users about time limits and wagering requirements, creating a closed-loop system that balances engagement with revenue generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If wagering requirements are imposed to maintain video playback, then revenue generation and operational efficiency are improved, but user convenience and ease of operation worsen due to time limits and wagering mandates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides preliminary action by displaying alert messages that inform users of upcoming time limits and wagering requirements before the video is suspended. This advance notification allows users to prepare and place wagers proactively, reducing the abruptness of the constraint and improving perceived convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic action through time-limited wagering opportunities. Video playback is suspended periodically if wagering requirements are not met within specified time frames, creating structured intervals that balance revenue generation with user convenience by providing clear expectations and opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If video playback is suspended when wagering requirements are not met, then operational efficiency and revenue optimization are improved, but user experience and spectator involvement deteriorate due to interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidspectator involvement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic state transitions where video playback alternates between playing and suspended states based on wagering compliance. This dynamic approach optimizes operational efficiency by suspending video only when necessary while maintaining spectator involvement through clear communication of requirements and opportunities to resume playback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback through alert messages that inform users of wagering requirements and time limits before suspension occurs. This feedback mechanism maintains spectator involvement by keeping users engaged in the process and informed of their options, rather than simply interrupting playback without explanation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If time limits are imposed for wager selection, then operational efficiency and revenue optimization are improved, but user flexibility and ease of operation worsen due to pressure to decide quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiduser flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides preliminary action by giving users advance notice of time limits through alert messages before video suspension occurs. This allows users to plan their wagering decisions within the time frame, reducing the stress of sudden deadlines while maintaining operational efficiency through structured time management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250285513A1Game event-based funding for a progressive wagering game
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250285513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250285513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250285513A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of operating a gaming device includes providing, by a processor circuit of the gaming device, video of a sporting event to a display device of the gaming device. The method further includes determining, by the processor circuit, whether a wager has been selected from among a set of wagers which satisfies a wager requirement for continuing providing the video. The method further includes, in response to a determination that the wager requirement for continuing providing the video has not been satisfied, suspending, by the processor circuit, providing the video of the sporting event to the display device.